FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[Poit]

@Chess, I don't know if he has been deleting his own posts or an admin has, but either way, I would suggest to not argue with him.. you are giving him exactly what he wants.... just ignore him.

[chessnyt]

@Chess, I don't know if he has been deleting his own posts or an admin has, but either way, I would suggest to not argue with him.. you are giving him exactly what he wants.... just ignore him.

@Poit:
You're right.  I should have ignored him. 

[chessnyt]

@Everybody:

Andrea Rossi and his E-Cat technology appear to be gaining traction in the mainstream media.  In addition to FOX, there are others starting to pick up the ball…

“The number of media organisations dipping toes into the eCat story continues to grow. From Fox to MSNBC and the UK’s Daily Mail to Wired UK, Forbes and more.” â€" LINK http://ecatnews.com/


Regards,

Chess

[IronShell3d]

What Rossi has demonstrated is not new, Ni-H LENR reactions have been known about since the early 90's.

Cold Fusion â€" The history of research in Italy:
http://www.sede.enea.it/com/ingl/New_ingl/publications/pdf/Cold_Fusion_Italy.pdf

1994 peer reviewed Ni-H paper showing the reaction produced 3 times more energy than could be explained by a chemical reaction:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/1994/1994Focardi-AnomalousHeatNi-H-NuovoCimento.pdf

1998 paper which also showed Ni-H LENR heat generation for 289 days:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSlargeexces.pdf

In Cold fusion â€" The history of research in Italy, the researchers add that they observed events of nuclear origins:

During the experiments, which altogether lasted for about 15 years, many phenomena witnessing nuclear reactions inside Ni samples in H atmosphere were observed. While it was producing energy, the cell which produced 900 MJ emitted neutrons for some days ... equal to 1000 times the neutron flux due to cosmic radiation. ... Other events, whose existence can only be due to nuclear reactions, were observed at the end of the experiments ... We observed in remarkable quantity Cu and Zn (with atomic number greater than Ni), F, Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Mn, Cr, Fe (Fig. 3).

All that Rossi has done is to raise the public visibility of the already known Ni-H LENR reaction and to make a commercial device that produces enough heat energy to be very useful.

There is however a fraud and / or scam going on here here, that has and is being created by those who attempt to discredit Rossi for their own reasons but in trying to do so they also need to discredit all the other Ni-H researchers and their published results.

[chessnyt]

What Rossi has demonstrated is not new, Ni-H LENR reactions have been known about since the early 90's.

Cold Fusion â€" The history of research in Italy:
http://www.sede.enea.it/com/ingl/New_ingl/publications/pdf/Cold_Fusion_Italy.pdf

1994 peer reviewed Ni-H paper showing the reaction produced 3 times more energy than could be explained by a chemical reaction:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/1994/1994Focardi-AnomalousHeatNi-H-NuovoCimento.pdf

1998 paper which also showed Ni-H LENR heat generation for 289 days:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FocardiSlargeexces.pdf

In Cold fusion â€" The history of research in Italy, the researchers add that they observed events of nuclear origins:

All that Rossi has done is to raise the public visibility of the already known Ni-H LENR reaction and to make a commercial device that produces enough heat energy to be very useful.

There is however a fraud and / or scam going on here here, that has and is being created by those who attempt to discredit Rossi for their own reasons but in trying to do so they also need to discredit all the other Ni-H researchers and their published results.

YES!  Very true!  As you stated, LENR has been around for quite some time now and is nothing new.  Right again you are about Rossi selling a device that uses the technology (LENR) to clearly show what others have known all along.

The only thing you left out was the fact that ALL prior published results of LENR (that showed excess heat) admittedly stated that researchers could not do so consistently (4 out of 10 experiments, some even less).  This would explain why no other scientist(s) are anywhere near the stage of releasing their findings via a commercially marketed product. 

So what is different between Rossi's LENR process and his predecessors' LENR process is that Rossi is able to get a positive result (excess heat) every time (100% of the time). 


Regards,

Chess