FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[chessnyt]

@Rosemary:
Thank you for such a detailed response as I was especially impressed with your background research into Rossi's prior entanglement(s) with opposing forces.  This may have been what Rossi was referring to when he called his enemies "blackmailers" and the like. 

I had not read the thread in which Rossi was attacked with "psyops" propaganda but it certainly comes as no surprise to me just as the spam attack you reported earlier did in fact also occur as I checked into it myself.  Stanley Meyer was also attacked in a similar fashion on the heels of a civil suit in which he was found guilty of fraud and was ordered to repay two investors who brought about the suit.  To this day, enemies of his research still try to dismiss his technology with the fraud suit which was a setup from the get go.  In fact, there's a thread here at overunity.com which covers the details surrounding this case in great detail.  A similar attack used against Rossi is the Pons and Fleishman announcement which is what many academics try to use to destroy Rossi's claims despite the clear and distinct differences in the reactors (as well as other key parameters).       

Now as far as the "self promotion" and "detraction" issues are concerned; I wasn't insinuating that either was the case on your part.  What I meant by "This is Rossi's moment..." is that I was refusing to go into greater detail concerning my own field of research as I could always do that in another thread at another time when my own results warranted such an effort.  I was also attempting to clear up why I was NOT in an authoritive position to thoroughly explain Rossi's technology as my own personal area of expertise is completely unrelated. 

On the contrary, I deeply appreciate your efforts to spread the word about the E-Cat as well as your very insightful articles (one of which was more than justified in being published) in which you chronicle Rossi's efforts.


Best regards,
Chess 

[chessnyt]

Of course! I fully understand and empathize with their position.

Personally, I was disappointed on the date of the 1MW plant because leading up to the test we were told that we would know who the customer was, and I believe we were told the underlying theory of the technology would be explained.

Now that that hasn't happened, I was hoping someone could clarify what facts we could use to assure ourselves that this customer actually exists.

@bullsnbears1:
I too was disappointed with an assortment of shortcomings on the 1 megawatt plant debut.  The customer was in fact supposed to be announced on the 28th of October, however, I believe this was a misunderstanding on the part of the author of the article who may have simply assumed it would be obvious or evident as the customer would in deed be present on the day of testing. 

One of the other shortcomings I was disappointed with was the output of the power plant which was only about half of what is was supposed to be.  This turned out to be a minor engineering glitch due to faulty gaskets (which have since been replaced) which were not capable of sealing the joints/flanges due to the amount of heat and pressure of the steam produced by the reactors at maximum output. 

I hope the customer is revealed in the not too distant future as well when the technology has had ample time to further proliferate. 


Regards,

Chess

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Good stuff Chess.

In any event, here's the thing.  Where I am decidedly unpopular with free energy enthusiasts as well as with our academics is that both have been flirting with 'new theory' to explain either their own over unity results or their arguments for all this energy - respectively.  Only our academics have a coherent argument which is managed in the exotic thinking of our string theorists.  And then it's an even smaller subdivision of these theorists who actually have the entire answer which they can prove mathematically.  But that answer is impossibly obtuse and outside the reach even of our standard theorists.   But the physics experimentalists have not identified the 'carrier particle' despite some hefty research funding. 

Which means, that it's highly unlikely that Rossi's work will become 'respectable' until they've managed the explanation.  And we most assuredly have that explanation.  And its beauty is that it's OBVIOUS.  Which makes it extremely unpopular.  Everyone can understand why certain facts have eluded detection when they're that subtle that they require extraordinary genius to be found.  One does not expect a ham fisted elderly woman from the back end of Africa - to point to some obvious oversights in physics that then renders the explanation for all this into terms that are EASILY understood.  The more so when she's a self-confessed ignoramus on matters scientific.  Which, is the unfortunate part that we played with our evidence and the thesis that predicted that evidence.

Now.  You say you're now familiar with that 'attack' which I've had.  Know this.  Since we've submitted those papers for publication and since that second part of the two part paper can now be referenced on a blogsite that cannot be 'attacked' by that little band of well fed 'dogs' - that attack has STOPPED.  It's extraordinary.  And I know why.  If they continued to attack either me or that little thesis of ours then they'll draw attention to it.  And that will serve to PROMOTE it.   They're hell bent on hiding the solution.  Not advancing it. 

But that's neither here nor there.  The point is this.  If indeed, Rossi is accessing 'dark energy' which we can argue with very real competence - then he does not need to explain anything at all.  Dark energy has already been proved.  They're trying to locate it.  We propose that it's in magnetic fields.  And magnetic fields are EVERYWHERE.  God knows.  We live in a bath of it right here on the surface of planet Earth.  Then.  You see this I hope.  There will be NOTHING to stop that technology from not only being installed - but being progressed - YET FURTHER.  There are many, many ways to skin this (e) CAT.

 

And - at the risk of going on and on - just also know that we have very carefully not published that 1st part of our paper anywhere on the internet.  That's because it would run the risk of letting those dogs do what Josephsson proposed that Celani do - which is to broadcast that the results are 'FALLACIOUS'.  I have an abiding respect for the amazing skills of our TROLLS.  They are extremely effective.  And that 1st part of that two part paper details the evidence of a test that dissipates in excess of 130 watts - while the batttery RECHARGES.  That's the kind of efficiency that Rossi has shown us.  Obviously on a smaller scale.  But it warrants a certain amount of pause.  Certainly it's substantial proof of the thesis.  But.  Having said that.  We have only got that heat signature with the use of batteries.  And they're clumsy at best.  Rossi's solution is IMPECCABLE. 

But where the entire cause could be much better served is if more of you could wrap your minds around some very simple facts that are included in that paper.  When those principles are better understood then the question will no longer be 'how is this done' but 'how could one NOT approve Rossi's technology?'.  That's the point we need to reach.  I think.

Can't wait.  Where I LOVE our academics, is that they actually will NEVER settle for a partial solution.  I know that once they've thrashed out the answer it will, indeed, be the answer.  And I also know that the evidence is in this modest but elusive magnetic  field which is a primary rather than a secondary force.

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@bullsnbears1:
I too was disappointed with an assortment of shortcomings on the 1 megawatt plant debut.  The customer was in fact supposed to be announced on the 28th of October, however, I believe this was a misunderstanding on the part of the author of the article who may have simply assumed it would be obvious or evident as the customer would in deed be present on the day of testing. 

One of the other shortcomings I was disappointed with was the output of the power plant which was only about half of what is was supposed to be.  This turned out to be a minor engineering glitch due to faulty gaskets (which have since been replaced) which were not capable of sealing the joints/flanges due to the amount of heat and pressure of the steam produced by the reactors at maximum output. 

I hope the customer is revealed in the not too distant future as well when the technology has had ample time to further proliferate. 


Regards,

Chess

Chess, and bullsnbears - that test was NOT a fail.  It was showing a self running system at 450 KW.  THAT'S HUGE.  It just did not reach the targeted and full potential.  But that's the vagaries of all demonstrations.  One does not expect duplication 'ON DEMAND'.  Of course shit happens.  And who knows this better than an experimentalist.  But I am at an entire loss to understand how 450 MW greater than unity can represent anything other than a resounding success.  Personally I'd have popped the odd bottle -  at 1 KW.
 
And as for that buyer remaining anonymous.  I have every sympathy.  On the whole it's required.  Your average company is owned by a variety of shareholders.  When it's a public company that holding can influence company policy.  It has the potential for investors that could easily bend the majority shareholders' opinion in any way required.  On the whole it's shows a salutary caution.  I'm sure that the 'secrecy' will not be required once the e-cat's installed.

But, on another point, I also think that Rossi's cause would be better served if he started out with smaller units.  We, the public have absolutely no interest in anything other than to install it and get us off grid.  And we are NOT at the mercy of shareholders and their opinions.  Hopefully he'll get around to this sooner rather than later. 

Kindest again,
Rosemary

EDITED.Guys, I've amended this post to read K Watts and not Megawatts.  Is this right?  I thought Rossi generated 450 mega watts?  Please advise, or give that link again.  I can't find it.

[TEKTRON]

the Install was 1 megawatt. test ran to 480 kilowatt.