FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[FatBird]

Click on this link to see a SUPER GOOD news article on the current status of Free Energy:


http://rense.com/general95/worldfre.htm


.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Many thanks for the good wishes Neptune.  And Fatbird.  That article link you posted was good.  Very heavy.

My concerns about it relate to the following paragraph where the author states that 'free energy' will spark national confrontations.  This is not correct.  Free energy and national ownership of it are mutually exclusive terms.  Contradictory is perhaps a better description.  It's actually NOT POSSIBLE.  Once free energy is also freely applied - then there is absolutely NOTHING to sustain our national boundaries.  THAT'S THE REAL ISSUE.  It will dissolve our differences in our new quest for resolution to our many, many economic imbalances.  And this is only the first step.  Because hot on the heels of this are the intellectual implications of free energy.  Theoretically IF free energy is doable - then there are no further restrictions to any of the forces - including time travel - anti gravity devices - and on and on. 

There's one big problem though.  If the explanation for Rossi's device is hidden behind a welter of confusing scientific explanation - then we, the public - will again be duped into believing in there is a need for the EXPERT before we can apply that knowledge.  THAT'S the real danger.  We'll be obliged to 'buy into' his technology rather than understand it and build it ourselves.  Hopefully that won't happen.

  "Free energy technology is a national government's worst nightmare! Openly acknowledged, free energy technology sparks an unlimited arms race by all governments in a final attempt to gain absolute advantage and domination. Think about it. Do you think Japan will not feel intimidated if China gets free energy? Do you think Israel will sit by quietly as Iraq acquires free energy? Do you think India will allow Pakistan to develop free energy? Do you think the USA would not try to stop Osama bin Laden from getting free energy?"

...is all a lot of nonsense.


Nice to see this thread back.  WHERE ARE YOU CHESS?  Guys.  I'm a bit concerned that we're not hearing from him.


Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[Bernie7]

Hi Rosemary:      RE: Rossi and patents

I can assure you Rossi is not stupid, he has made all the filings necessary to protect his intellectual property.

As far as I can see he is acting like a logical, smart entrepreneur.  The powers to be will not issue patents for LENR, “because it is impossible”.  Until they wake up there is only one avenue open to him, build and sell e-Cats.  He needs money and cannot wait for the bureaucracy to catch up to him.  If his company has the only LENR reactor that is producing 1mW of energy and he has built and sold say 100, there is no doubt that he will get his patent or a big part of any compromise between patent holders that is  based on LENR.  Why should he reveal his “secret” and let a GE  out produce him and then with their 1001 lawyers fight him for patent rights because GE engineers added three bolts to a Rossi’s reactor.  Be patient Rossi is on the right track.   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Rosemary:      RE: Rossi and patents

I can assure you Rossi is not stupid, he has made all the filings necessary to protect his intellectual property.

As far as I can see he is acting like a logical, smart entrepreneur.  The powers to be will not issue patents for LENR, “because it is impossible”.  Until they wake up there is only one avenue open to him, build and sell e-Cats.  He needs money and cannot wait for the bureaucracy to catch up to him.  If his company has the only LENR reactor that is producing 1mW of energy and he has built and sold say 100, there is no doubt that he will get his patent or a big part of any compromise between patent holders that is  based on LENR.  Why should he reveal his “secret” and let a GE  out produce him and then with their 1001 lawyers fight him for patent rights because GE engineers added three bolts to a Rossi’s reactor.  Be patient Rossi is on the right track.   

I agree Bernie.  Absolutely.  Personally I don't think he's hiding anything at all.  I've argued that this would jeopardise his patent rights? Not sure if that's right.  But either way - INDEED - he deserves everything that he's worked for - and more.  He's made all of this technologically feasible which is more than any of us managed.  And therein lies our hopes for a solution to all this global mess that we're dealing with.

What I'm pointing to is the need for us all to understand the principles behind the technology.  I would be really sorry if our Governments manage to trump up legislation that prevents our own 'hands on' applications - based on any suggestion that the technology is too dangerous.  That would be disastrous if we're to research the principles more thoroughly and widely.   I suppose what I would really prefer is that we can manage to construct our own 'home grown' versions of the same thing.  That is the only way to prevent any monopolistic reach.  God forbid that Rossi nominate the manufacturers and that they work with the implicit or explicit co-operation of sundry governmental agencies.  Because then we'll be as trapped as we are at present with our utility suppliers.  And this can be done - if we don't wrap our minds around the physical principles behind the technology.  Right now it's argued as LENR.  I'm not qualified to comment.  But one of our collaborators who is well qualified - assures me that the explanation in terms of anything at all - is grossly flawed.  I've tried to follow the arguments myself.  From what I see Rossi is claiming that it's the -62 version that allows for these results.  In any event.  Whatever the explanation - I'm reasonably certain that other materials can be used as a substitute.  And I personally think we need to find alternatives - precisely to ensure that there is a wide scope of options leading to the same result.

But first things first.  Let's get those E-cats up and running with buyers who'll also admit ownership.  That will be the start.  And Rossi deserves everything owing in terms of intellectual property ownership.  But I trust there will be NOTHING to prevent a wide number of manufacturers of the E-cat.  Or.  To put it another way.  God forbid that Rossi also garner a monopoly on production.  Because then we're screwed.

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys, do any of you know how to reach Chess?  I've had some considerable email correspondence with him.  But not since mid December.  And I'm wondering if all is well there.

Can any of you check?  Or is there any way of finding out what gives?  Please advise.  I'm more than a little concerned.  And would be glad of advice here.  Last I heard was he was going to do his own version of the E-cat.  Since then - NOTHING

Kindest regards,
Rosemary