FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[gravityblock]

Thanks for the clarification Gravock.  Now.  Do you have something to tell us related to LENR.  We're all trying to find out if there is anything on offer that resolves this.  That would really be interesting.

Thanks,
Rosemary

Do I have something to tell which is related to LENR?  Yes, I do.  If those 2 girls in the below picture can do it, then we can too.  They built a working LENR device. Test results of their experiment can be found at this link.  Naudin's LENR test results are very impressive and can be found here.  My advice would be to start building.  There is no need to wait on Rossi, for there are more than one way to skin a cat (e-Cat that is).

Gravock

[chessnyt]

While Mark is a phenominal debator,. its very rare that i find me and him seeing eye to eye on most issues.. 

But i have to agree with him here, he makes a very valid point....

Why does the energy equivalency of this system seem to persist, regardless of the arrangement?

to put it quite simply, ... regardless of energy input, or output of the system, the mass to energy equivalency of the internal system, is conserved.

YES, this type of system allows us to perform reactions, at energy levels much lower than those used in other types of systems.. However, this equivalency remains unchanged. You can analyze this system from either perspective, with the square of c, or the square of T, and there will always be a proportional ratio between energy and mass. (ths is because of the relativity between the speed of light and "time" )

The bottom line is, altering either the input, or the output of the system, alters the relative reaction rate of the internal system. Thus making this system, completely "conservative", meaning it does not violate any laws of physics.

As far as the C.O.P. is concerned,.. This value is always going to be obscured by an external analysis, and until the scientists involved fully understand the processes they are toying around with, there will always be a line in the sand, between those who 'observe' anomalous C.O.P. values, and those who are ingenuitive enough to resolve them from a 'Black-Box' analysis.

The fact of the matter remains unchanged.. It is halfway through Feb. and we still see no "game changer"

@Smokey:
Well, when are you going to break the news to NASA?  I Know!  I'll pick you and Mark up and take you both over to NASA!  Then you can straighten those clowns out.  The nerve of credentialed scientists telling nobodies like you and Mark that LENR is for real. 

After you get those head scientists over at NASA straightened out, I'll drive you both over to MIT next and you can get started on these guys.  The nerve of those guys!!!  Maybe you and Mark can take over both MIT and NASA?  Meanwhile, I'll see if I can make you guys up some badges to get past security.

Now be sure to let us know MIT's and NASA's response.  I think you guys got 'em...


Chess

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Do I have something to tell which is related to LENR?  Yes, I do.  If those 2 girls in the below picture can do it, then we can too.  They built a working LENR device. Test results of their experiment can be found at this link.  Naudin's LENR test results are very impressive and can be found here.  My advice would be to start building.  There is no need to wait on Rossi, for there are more than one way to skin a cat (e-Cat that is).

Gravock

Very nice indeed Gravock.  However not exactly what I asked.  But nonetheless very interesting indeed.  It seems that our high school students could manage this relatively easily.  And that's really important - that we don't get too dependent on our generator suppliers.  It'll keep their costs realistic too.  Which is a good thing.  I'm always concerned that we'll end up relying on another set of expertise that makes it difficult to simply apply this energy as required.  Then we'll become overly dependent on what could also become another kind of monopoly.  What will our poor energy suppliers do - in the face of all this?  If I was a broker - then about now I'd be advising my clients to start off loading standard energy stocks.  LOL

Kindest as ever
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@Smokey:
Well, when are you going to break the news to NASA?  I Know!  I'll pick you and Mark up and take you both over to NASA!  Then you can straighten those clowns out.  The nerve of credentialed scientists telling nobodies like you and Mark that LENR is for real. 

After you get those head scientists over at NASA straightened out, I'll drive you both over to MIT next and you can get started on these guys.  The nerve of those guys!!!  Maybe you and Mark can take over both MIT and NASA?  Meanwhile, I'll see if I can make you guys up some badges to get past security.

Now be sure to let us know MIT's and NASA's response.  I think you guys got 'em...


Chess

Indeed.  Our members can yet make a positive contribution before this nonsense gets out of hand.  Critical.  LOL

Kindest, as ever,
Rosie

[chessnyt]

Very nice indeed Gravock.  However not exactly what I asked.  But nonetheless very interesting indeed.  It seems that our high school students could manage this relatively easily.  And that's really important - that we don't get too dependent on our generator suppliers.  It'll keep their costs realistic too.  Which is a good thing.  I'm always concerned that we'll end up relying on another set of expertise that makes it difficult to simply apply this energy as required.  Then we'll become overly dependent on what could also become another kind of monopoly.  What will our poor energy suppliers do - in the face of all this?  If I was a broker - then about now I'd be advising my clients to start off loading standard energy stocks.  LOL

Kindest as ever
Rosemary

@Rosemary:
If you view the video attached to the opening post of this thread, there is actually someone in the video advising another to do just this saying something like, "If you hurry, there's still time for you to sell your Mobil/Exxon shares" (I'm paraphrasing here).

Yes, this is almost going to look so much like mass insider trader.  Exxon/Mobil has got to be thinking "SUCKERS!" to everyone who buys a share at this point.  No wonder they have to keep the majority of the media away from this story.  It's a good thing they own them and even were able to buy them on the cheap 

Talk about a fiery stock crash


Chess