FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Teslaalset - I'm out of here.  If you want all that pseudoscience - then go for it.  I'm not about to engage.  And I've really only touched on the criticism of his science.  I haven't even got close to the harm it does our forums.  And the very real pleasure this kind of nonsense gives our detractors.

I most certainly WAS NOT critical of the man.  I was rather too complimentary.  Gravock on the other hand has been profoundly insulting - especially as he sees me as Beelzebub incarnate.  How old is he?  And you didn't seem to mind that so much?  Why IS that teslaalset?

Anyway guys.  Everyone has the right to believe what they want.  And this is certainly NOT my thread - that I can recommend some kind of standard.  Out of line.  Certainly.

I wish you well.  I'm de-registering from this thread.  I'll dip in from time to time.  And Chess - I"ll stay in touch.
Regards,
Rosemary

[pix]

It is end of February.
Where is that "game changer"?
Rossi has nothing more than improved Blacklightpower and Piantelli invention.Please look for Thermacore patent from 1991.
The only "invention" from clever ( I would rather say a smart ass) Rossi is use of Nickel nanopowders instead of Nickel rods. Reaction area is in order of magnitude larger-thus bigger thermal output.
Just multiply Piantelli's or Thermacore experiments thermal output  by increased reaction area factor- and you will have Rossi.
Of course Nickel powder before going into cell needs to be properly treated- just annealed and purged in the deep vacuum for enough time to remove all moist and gases.
Mix this with one of openly disclosed Mill's catalysts, for example K2CO3 and that's it.
Big deal.

Regards,
pix

[gravityblock]

Good morning All,

Like the electron-positron being the same particle with opposite rotation direction, the neutron-proton are the same particle with different configurations of the quarks with different fractional charges. (one has 2 up quarks and 1 down quark, while the other has 2 down quarks and 1 up quark).  I don't want to hear how they have a very slight difference in mass.  This is due to other reasons which I don't care to get into, and is really outside the scope of this discussion.  I'll be on the road soon.

Take care,

Gravock

[maw2432]

Interesting info.
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/02/18/national-instruments-denies-relationship-with-rossi/

added this link..
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/02/rossi-confirms-leonardo-corp-no-longer-working-with-national-instruments-new-supplier-involved/

[lwh]

I'd like to suggest people take their theorizing about how these devices might work to another thread, and leave this one to serve its original purpose as a venue for relaying news about the bringing of these devices to market.

No disrespect intended towards any of the proponents of any of the conflicting theories, but when you start arguing and insulting each other that itself is showing disrespect to everyone else who has to witness it.  If it's that important to you, take it outside as it were and start another thread that others don't have to see if they don't want to. 

I don't think there's any harm in posting links here to theoretical information on other threads or websites that others can follow if they're interested, but this thread in the news section isn't the place for debating or arguing or trying to educate others about the theoretical science behind how the subject of this news thread works.

Thanks for your consideration.