FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Yes, you can put your hands on one for $1.5 million dollars.
 
This technology (which you refer to as "BS technology") is already being endorsed by NASA so are you a credentialed scientist whose credentials are above that of the scientists at NASA? 

Now, this is what REAL CREDENTIALED scientists are saying about LENR technology (I knew you would forever treasure these direct quotes so you're quite welcome in advance):
   
“Over 2 decades with over 100 experiments worldwide indicate LENR is real, much greater than chemical…” â€"-Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center

“Energy density many orders of magnitude over chemical.” --Michael A. Nelson, NASA

“Total replacement of fossil fuels for everything but synthetic organic chemistry.” â€"-Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny, NASA

LENR has been confirmed in hundreds of published scientific papers:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf

Can we see your PUBLISHED results, happyfunball?  I'm sure you have them with you somewhere...we'll be waiting 


Regards,

Chess

Brilliantly answered Chess.  I looked at Happy's post and thought about replying - but didn't have the energy - nor anywhere near the skill with which you've managed this.  But Happy has always been somewhat pessimistic.  His name is a misnomer.  LOL.  You need to cheer up Happy.  Live up to your name.  There's all kinds of hopeful happenings - all over the place.   And Rossi's E-cat is most certainly my own preference.  The best reminder that I can find that there's a hope for our futures.

Well done Chess and nice to see Happy around even if he's still as morbid as ever.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[happyfunball]

Yes, you can put your hands on one for $1.5 million dollars.
 
This technology (which you refer to as "BS technology") is already being endorsed by NASA so are you a credentialed scientist whose credentials are above that of the scientists at NASA? 

Now, this is what REAL CREDENTIALED scientists are saying about LENR technology (I knew you would forever treasure these direct quotes so you're quite welcome in advance):
   
“Over 2 decades with over 100 experiments worldwide indicate LENR is real, much greater than chemical…” â€"-Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center

“Energy density many orders of magnitude over chemical.” --Michael A. Nelson, NASA

“Total replacement of fossil fuels for everything but synthetic organic chemistry.” â€"-Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny, NASA

LENR has been confirmed in hundreds of published scientific papers:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf

Can we see your PUBLISHED results, happyfunball?  I'm sure you have them with you somewhere...we'll be waiting 


Regards,

Chess

LOL $1,500,000.00 and no trace of one powering anything anywhere, but hey we have a bunch of meaningless quotes and worthless testing which might be worth $150.00 if you're selling jokes. Pure comedy.

[chessnyt]

LOL $1,500,000.00 and no trace of one powering anything anywhere, but hey we have a bunch of meaningless quotes and worthless testing which might be worth $150.00 if you're selling jokes. Pure comedy.

@happyfunball:
Just as I thought.  Not one peer reviewed published result to the contrary in response.  Just more unsubstantiated dribble from an uncredentialed amateur.

When you dismiss meaningful quotes and announcements from an organization such as NASA, how can you seriously expect people to listen to you?  Do you really believe that people are going to believe your own personal meaningless quotes over those from NASA scientists?  Are you even reading your own opinions before you click on the post button?

I'll even bet that you didn't read even one published peer reviewed paper that I posted a link to. 

Ignoring the experts among the scientific community and saying it just isn't so will not make LENR technology go away no matter how much you would like it to.  There's just an avalanche of evidence (very well documented peer reviewed published papers) behind this new technology that can not be stopped or discredited by amateur opinion.  This is why I backed my statements up with factual quotes and scientific published documentation.  Obviously, you have no factual evidence to discredit the legitimately credentialed scientists from NASA that I quoted (or you would have done so). 

In my last posting, I neglected to also mention the recently released video from NASA.  Here's a link to it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8ZEmsw9pPw

I hoped you watched the video, happyfunball.  Did I mention NASA? 

The joke, happyfunball, is thinking that people who read your posts will take your word over the words of many NASA scientists.

I did mention the NASA video didn't I?  Did I remember to mention the 1000's of positive (PUBLISHED) results in peer reviewed scientific journals around the world concerning LENR technology?

Oh, and when can we expect your PUBLISHED results from your lab, happyfunball? 


Regards,

Chess

P.S. Did I mention NASA...as in the rocket scientists?

[happyfunball]

@happyfunball:
Just as I thought.  Not one peer reviewed published result to the contrary in response.  Just more unsubstantiated dribble from an uncredentialed amateur.

When you dismiss meaningful quotes and announcements from an organization such as NASA, how can you seriously expect people to listen to you?  Do you really believe that people are going to believe your own personal meaningless quotes over those from NASA scientists?  Are you even reading your own opinions before you click on the post button?

I'll even bet that you didn't read even one published peer reviewed paper that I posted a link to. 

Ignoring the experts among the scientific community and saying it just isn't so will not make LENR technology go away no matter how much you would like it to.  There's just an avalanche of evidence (very well documented peer reviewed published papers) behind this new technology that can not be stopped or discredited by amateur opinion.  This is why I backed my statements up with factual quotes and scientific published documentation.  Obviously, you have no factual evidence to discredit the legitimately credentialed scientists from NASA that I quoted (or you would have done so). 

In my last posting, I neglected to also mention the recently released video from NASA.  Here's a link to it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8ZEmsw9pPw

I hoped you watched the video, happyfunball.  Did I mention NASA? 

The joke, happyfunball, is thinking that people who read your posts will take your word over the words of many NASA scientists.

I did mention the NASA video didn't I?  Did I remember to mention the 1000's of positive (PUBLISHED) results in peer reviewed scientific journals around the world concerning LENR technology?

Oh, and when can we expect your PUBLISHED results from your lab, happyfunball? 


Regards,

Chess

P.S. Did I mention NASA...as in the rocket scientists?

None of the NASA quotes lend a scintilla of credence to Rossi's claims.  They're just quotes, no tangible working device. It's all just hopes and dreams, while Rossi (With Sterling's help) is busy setting up the illusion of legitimacy in hopes of luring some poor sucker in, which I fear has already happened.

[chessnyt]

@happyfunball:
You obviously have no idea how science works concerning peer review published papers.  You obviously have no idea why they are so significant.

"None of the NASA quotes lend a scintilla of credence to Rossi's claims."

You would be absolutely correct if Rossi's devices were based on gravity/leverage or some other technology not being endorsed by NASA and MIT (just to name a few).  Since Rossi's devices are based on LENR (and it is clearly accepted by major mainstream science), there is nothing really suprising about them at all.  You simply CAN NOT attack Rossi without attacking NASA at the same time as this is the same technology (LENR) that Rossi's devices are based on.  He's not claiming to have a selfrunning magnet motor here.

"It's all just hopes and dreams..."

The following quotes are NOT hopes and dreams, happyfunball.  They are a matter of fact.  There is overwhelming amounts (below, Bushnell states "hundreds") of experimental evidence
to confirm LENR as a real and legitimate technology.  There is no evidence to the contrary that you possess. 

“Over 2 decades with over 100 experiments worldwide indicate LENR is real, much greater than chemical…” â€"-Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center (note the term used here is "real".  Might want note that one)

“Energy density many orders of magnitude over chemical.” --Michael A. Nelson, NASA

“Total replacement of fossil fuels for everything but synthetic organic chemistry.” â€"-Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny, NASA (remember...you can not replace fossil fuels with dreams)

LENR has been confirmed in hundreds of published scientific papers:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf

You are certainly not going to win this argument as the deck is hopelessly stacked against you.  First you state that NASA's official public statements are "meaningless" and now you have switched to state that they lend no credence to Rossi's device.  Now which is it, happyfunball? 

(This is the part, however, that has my laughing myself to tears when reading your replies) And finally, do you really (I mean seriously) think you are better qualified than NASA scientists to debunk LENR technology that the E-cat is based on?


Cheers,

Chess