FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[happyfunball]

@happyfunball:
You obviously have no idea how science works concerning peer review published papers.  You obviously have no idea why they are so significant.
 
You would be absolutely correct if Rossi's devices were based on gravity/leverage or some other technology not being endorsed by NASA and MIT (just to name a few).  Since Rossi's devices are based on LENR (and it is clearly accepted by major mainstream science), there is nothing really suprising about them at all.  You simply CAN NOT attack Rossi without attacking NASA at the same time as this is the same technology (LENR) that Rossi's devices are based on.  He's not claiming to have a selfrunning magnet motor here.
 
The following quotes are NOT hopes and dreams, happyfunball.  They are a matter of fact.  There is overwhelming amounts (below, Bushnell states "hundreds") of experimental evidence
to confirm LENR as a real and legitimate technology.  There is no evidence to the contrary that you possess. 

“Over 2 decades with over 100 experiments worldwide indicate LENR is real, much greater than chemical…” â€"-Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center (note the term used here is "real".  Might want note that one)

“Energy density many orders of magnitude over chemical.” --Michael A. Nelson, NASA

“Total replacement of fossil fuels for everything but synthetic organic chemistry.” â€"-Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny, NASA (remember...you can not replace fossil fuels with dreams)

LENR has been confirmed in hundreds of published scientific papers:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf

You are certainly not going to win this argument as the deck is hopelessly stacked against you.  First you state that NASA's official public statements are "meaningless" and now you have switched to state that they lend no credence to Rossi's device.  Now which is it, happyfunball? 

(This is the part, however, that has my laughing myself to tears when reading your replies) And finally, do you really (I mean seriously) think you are better qualified than NASA scientists to debunk LENR technology that the E-cat is based on?


Cheers,

Chess

Lol meanwhile LENR power is nowhere to be found, and Rossi has the goofball crowd frothing at the mouth over random unrelated quotes. Pure comedy.

[jan.kolar]

Lol meanwhile LENR power is nowhere to be found, and Rossi has the goofball crowd frothing at the mouth over random unrelated quotes. Pure comedy.

Just one question. Have you read at least one peer-reviewed report about cold fusion (option A) or are you just talking about your fantasies (option B)?

[happyfunball]

Just one question. Have you read at least one peer-reviewed report about cold fusion (option A) or are you just talking about your fantasies (option B)?

Sure I've read a few, but am not an expert. Please explain how they are at all related to Rossi's scam.

[chessnyt]

Brilliantly answered Chess.  I looked at Happy's post and thought about replying - but didn't have the energy - nor anywhere near the skill with which you've managed this.  But Happy has always been somewhat pessimistic.  His name is a misnomer.  LOL.  You need to cheer up Happy.  Live up to your name.  There's all kinds of hopeful happenings - all over the place.   And Rossi's E-cat is most certainly my own preference.  The best reminder that I can find that there's a hope for our futures.

Well done Chess and nice to see Happy around even if he's still as morbid as ever.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

@Rosemary:
Nothing dispels the lies people try to plant here like the truth.  Just as darkness can only prevail in the absence of light, so a lie can only survive in the absence of the truth.

I love killing bad seeds before they have a place to grow.

Nice to see you, as always Rosemary   


Warmest Regards,

Chess

[happyfunball]

Looks like Sterling has had it with Rossi over at PesWiki.