FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[chessnyt]

@Everyone:
Here's some interesting news concerning LENR being taught currently at MIT.  Sterling Allan from PESN.com was informed yesterday that Dr. Mitch Swartz's demo is STILL RUNNING!

"I talked with Dr. Mitch Swartz of MIT yesterday, and he said that his demo that he did for the "Cold Fusion 101" class is still running, and has been doing so continuously for two months, at 7-times overunity." --Sterling D. Allan; March 20, 2012

7 times OVERUNITY is some pretty impressive results!  I wonder if they offer an on-line Cold Fusion 101 course?!?


Regards,

Chess

[Gwandau]

Concerning low efficiency of transformation of heat in electricity please check nitinol engines.

nfeijo posted earlier about nitinol engines, which is the today OU startpage video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoAFc_DeWVQ

This is as far as I am concerned the perfect way to create electricity enough to drive the e-cat.

Sorry nfeijo, that I missed your valuable input.

Gwandau

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Always a pleasure to get back here for some much needed R&R guys.  And always a pleasure to read these thoughtful posts Chess, Gwandau - all.  I've also been greatly heartened by the news about nitinol.  Always the last to hear the news.  But delighted to know of this.  It occurs to me that perhaps Rossi could exploit these nitinol properties to let all his heat run those motors.  To me it would be a marriage in heaven.  Apparently it is easily managed as there's a direct transfer of heat to motion. 

I also see Gwandau's complaint as valid.  Just to heat one's house helps - but it will never satisfy our need to decouple from our energy monopolists.  But it's certainly all good news.  I'm reasonably certain that no-one can prevent licensing for the manufacture of these generators while there's no evidence of gamma ray emissions.  It just puts Rossi in the embarrassing position of having to deny any nuclear reaction based on the lack of this.  But who cares?  It's the technology we need.  And rather critically.

Anyway all, just to let you know.  It's a real comfort to see those of you who are working so hard to keep this positive news in focus.  Much appreciated, and by the looks of your stats, by many more than just me.

Kindest and best to you all, and again, many thanks for this hard work.

Rosemary

[chessnyt]

Always a pleasure to get back here for some much needed R&R guys.  And always a pleasure to read these thoughtful posts Chess, Gwandau - all.  I've also been greatly heartened by the news about nitinol.  Always the last to hear the news.  But delighted to know of this.  It occurs to me that perhaps Rossi could exploit these nitinol properties to let all his heat run those motors.  To me it would be a marriage in heaven.  Apparently it is easily managed as there's a direct transfer of heat to motion. 

Yes, the nitinol engines appear to be one splendid way to harness the heat produced by the home E-Cat (as only a 20 degree temperature differential is required) versions and convert this heat directly and efficiently into mechanical force (to propel an electric generator).  Yes, there are always losses during any energy conversion but the nitinol engines may prove to be the most efficient route for the E-Cat.

I also see Gwandau's complaint as valid.  Just to heat one's house helps - but it will never satisfy our need to decouple from our energy monopolists.  But it's certainly all good news.  I'm reasonably certain that no-one can prevent licensing for the manufacture of these generators while there's no evidence of gamma ray emissions.  It just puts Rossi in the embarrassing position of having to deny any nuclear reaction based on the lack of this.  But who cares?  It's the technology we need.  And rather critically.

I'm almost sure that the Wright Brothers had initially hoped to be able to offer international flights carrying hundreds of passengers at a time in less than 8 hours as soon as the Kittyhawk flight proved successful, however, this was not very realistic.  Try to keep in mind that even airplanes took decades just to go from propeller driven to jet engine driven aircraft. 

The E-Cat is no different.  It's new technology that must still undergo years of development and adaptation before arriving at the home generator stage.  Even in its infant stage (home heating of water and air), it is important that it gets out into the mainstream to insure that its suppression will become increasingly difficult if not impossible thus insuring its further development and implementation.

Anyway all, just to let you know.  It's a real comfort to see those of you who are working so hard to keep this positive news in focus.  Much appreciated, and by the looks of your stats, by many more than just me.

I must agree.  There has been overwhelming participation by the readers of this thread to keep the E-Cat and the technology that it is based on from being dismissed and swept under the carpet.

I am about to start a new round of postings based on highlights from Mr. Rossi's most recent interview which occurred earlier this month.   


Until then, Cheers,

Chess

[chessnyt]

@Everyone:
Andrea Rossi's most recent interview was conducted by staff from ColdFusionNow.org at his Florida office and lasted about 30 minutes.

The following excerpt is one highlight from this interview:

Interviewer: "Can I ask you why does the powder work so well to create the large amounts of energy?"

Rossi: "Well, the powder is better than the bars for a very simple reason.  The surface of contact is enormously superior.  If you don't use the powder but you use the bar, the only contact surface with the atom of hydrogen is just the surface, the few fractions of square inch, that are in contact with hydrogen. If you have the powder, you have a universe within which every star is a particle of nickel with all it universe inside...therefore its contact surface is infinite."

So here, Rossi makes it very clear why nickel powder is superior to nickel in the solid bar form.  It's all about having the maximum contact surface area to facilitate a healthy reaction. 

This preceding line of logic makes perfect sense to me because I am involved with hydrogen production from electrolysis cells where maximum surface area is advantageous to me when it comes to my hydrogen fuel cell plates. 


Regards,

Chess