FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And replications done in universities, also BS vehiculated through the net or real ?

Hello parisd,

You might take the trouble to look at happyfunball's posts.  You'll see they're all rather committed to denying any kind of evidence of over unity.  Which makes it rather intriguing why he spends so much time on these forums.  If he's not actually supporting the evidence of unity breaches that are mushrooming just about EVERYWHERE - then he's at the wrong address.  Unless of course he has a vested interest in suppressing this knowledge.  God forbid.  I'm of the opinion that those energy cartels would have strong reason to try and suppress this knowledge.  And they'd have the funds to finance that suppression.  And just remember.  Since Dr Vest managed to relegate the study of alternate energy to the rather damning category of a 'pathological' science - then he's also managed the only argument available to deny any scientific opinion that is not also based on evidence.  It's the new standard of scientific assessment - based on allegation, hearsay and majority opinion - and failed replications.  Nothing to do with science. 

Thankfully that propagandising technique is no longer forceful.  It's been that abused that it induces an entirely opposite reaction. Fortunately these 'debunkers' 'disclaimers' call them what you will, have not yet caught up with this new reaction. And thankfully they discredit themselves precisely and in direct proportion to their lack of concern for the wider public good.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

added

[happyfunball]

Hello parisd,

You might take the trouble to look at happyfunball's posts.  You'll see they're all rather committed to denying any kind of evidence of over unity.  Which makes it rather intriguing why he spends so much time on these forums.  If he's not actually supporting the evidence of unity breaches that are mushrooming just about EVERYWHERE - then he's at the wrong address.  Unless of course he has a vested interest in suppressing this knowledge.  God forbid.  I'm of the opinion that those energy cartels would have strong reason to try and suppress this knowledge.  And they'd have the funds to finance that suppression.  And just remember.  Since Dr Vest managed to relegate the study of alternate energy to the rather damning category of a 'pathological' science - then he's also managed the only argument available to deny any scientific opinion that is not also based on evidence.  It's the new standard of scientific assessment - based on allegation, hearsay and majority opinion - and failed replications.  Nothing to do with science. 

Thankfully that propagandising technique is no longer forceful.  It's been that abused that it induces an entirely opposite reaction. Fortunately these 'debunkers' 'disclaimers' call them what you will, have not yet caught up with this new reaction. And thankfully they discredit themselves precisely and in direct proportion to their lack of concern for the wider public good.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

added

Funny how those mushrooms are consigned to random quotes and nothing tangible.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Funny how those mushrooms are consigned to random quotes and nothing tangible.

I think we could all agree that there's no emergent technology related to cold fusion.  But then we'd need to adopt your own selective interpretation of scientific evidence which is based on your extraordinary aptitudes to deny the evidence.  It's effective.  But I'm not sure that it's scientific.

But if it puts the 'happiness' into your 'happy fun ball' - feel free.  Thankfully no-one really cares about your opinion. 

Rosemary

[chessnyt]

I think we could all agree that there's no emergent technology related to cold fusion.  But then we'd need to adopt your own selective interpretation of scientific evidence which is based on your extraordinary aptitudes to deny the evidence.  It's effective.  But I'm not sure that it's scientific.

But if it puts the 'happiness' into your 'happy fun ball' - feel free.  Thankfully no-one really cares about your opinion. 

Rosemary

@Rosemary:
I've been busy in the lab but I am taking a little break to relax with some R&R in this thread again 

As you rightfully pointed out already Rosemary, the trolls have already discredited themselves trying to undermine not only this emerging technology, but also the authoritive scientists who endorse LENR.   

Quotes from sources such as top scientists EMPLOYED by NASA are not random quotes.  They're authoritive quotes that blabberball can not refute.  If he could prove LENR to be a fraud, he would have already successfully been instrumental in the firings of these "random quote" (who are not random in name) scientists at NASA and as of yet, they ALL still work there.

You have to consider the source of the troll.  He probably is not very proud of his career choice or he would have used his position or title to try and outweigh or impeach the experts quoted in this thread.  More than likely, he could be the janitor at NASA and knows his opinion is even worth less than it is currently (which is less than a tennis ball) should this information come to light. 

His fight is clearly not with us.  It is with NASA, MIT and all of the other sources mentioned in this thread that he is unable to discredit. 

@Everyone:
I have already started releasing quotes from Rossi's interview with Cold Fusion Now but I have decided to combine quotes from an interview he gave on March 29, 2012 with Oilprice.com as well.  This seems to displease the trolls the most so I am going to strike back knowing their greatest displeasure; MORE random quotes 


Best Regards,

Chess   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@Everyone:
I have already started releasing quotes from Rossi's interview with Cold Fusion Now but I have decided to combine quotes from an interview he gave on March 29, 2012 with Oilprice.com as well.  This seems to displease the trolls the most so I am going to strike back knowing their greatest displeasure; MORE random quotes 


Best Regards,

Chess

Grand Chess.   Can't wait.  And thank goodness the 'disclaimers' are also limited to 'denial' - which we all know has never constituted an argument let alone the proof of an argument.  I agree.  It's usually related to all kinds of inadequacies.  LOL