Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!


Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

Started by chessnyt, September 16, 2011, 06:57:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

The new poll  starting 2-4-2012:  LENR technology

a) will soon lead to the end of the fossil fuel era and become the new standard.
b) will compete with fossil fuels for decades to come eventually replacing them.
c) will not only phase out fossil fuels but will also lead to the trials of the current corrupt powers in charge.
d) will lead to all of the above.

lumen

MileHigh:
Your such a dumb ass!
Rossi did not say there is no factory in the US. That is what you THOUGHT YOU READ ( again Dumb ass for the second time!) He said "CURRENTLY ALL PRODUCTION IS OVER SEAS!"

For the last time get it right or get out!
Jesus christ you go on and on with the same old misinformation day after day trying to convince someone you are man that knew better and each day you look more like a court jester.

And YES there are no emissions out side of the e-cat. (only on the inside) slap / slap / slap ---- wake up man! Your dreaming in the past.






MileHigh

Lumen:

I don't remember the specifics in the report and if you are right then I stand corrected - within limits.  Within limits in the sense that you have to ask yourself why someone would lie to a federal agent if he asked you if you had a factory in the US.  Do you really think in the real world you can get off because of "technicalities" in your choice of words?  If the federal dude asks you if you have a factory in the US and the fatory is allegedly just a few months away from manufacturing a 1MW E-Cat you can't tell the federal agent that "CURRENTLY ALL PRODUCTION IS OVER SEAS!"  It's just insane.

QuoteAnd YES there are no emissions out side of the e-cat. (only on the inside) slap / slap / slap ---- wake up man! Your dreaming in the past.

That to me sounds like bend-over-ass-backwards Rossi fanboy talk.

The government asks you if your device produces radiation and you say no because of a "technicality?"  Oh jeez, the device produces radiation but we shield it therefore we can tell the government that the device does not produce radiation.  You must be out of your mind.  You are the one that needs the bitch-slapping, maybe you will wake up.

MileHigh

Magluvin

Quote from: MileHigh on May 16, 2012, 12:41:36 AM
Lumen:

I don't remember the specifics in the report and if you are right then I stand corrected - within limits.  Within limits in the sense that you have to ask yourself why someone would lie to a federal agent if he asked you if you had a factory in the US.  Do you really think in the real world you can get off because of "technicalities" in your choice of words?  If the federal dude asks you if you have a factory in the US and the fatory is allegedly just a few months away from manufacturing a 1MW E-Cat you can't tell the federal agent that "CURRENTLY ALL PRODUCTION IS OVER SEAS!"  It's just insane.

That to me sounds like bend-over-ass-backwards Rossi fanboy talk.

The government asks you if your device produces radiation and you say no because of a "technicality?"  Oh jeez, the device produces radiation but we shield it therefore we can tell the government that the device does not produce radiation.  You must be out of your mind.  You are the one that needs the bitch-slapping, maybe you will wake up.

MileHigh

You dont remember specifics? Then why are you posting as if you really know what you are talking about, when all you remember are Maybe the basics. That being that you dont remember the specifics. And that meaning that you are stating you did know at one point but dont know. So how the heck would you even entertain the thought that we must believe that you have even remembered the basics, upon which you draw conclusions and assumptions without detailed knowledge of any specifics, when you clearly admit to not remembering any specifics at all?
Selective memory serves you well when need be in these situations. ;)

So why is your memory so keen on the basics but completely flawed all the way on the specifics? Yet you argue with these guys that DO read and remember the specifics, and tell them they need bitch slapping? Like Lumen says, you must be a Dumb Ass. ;)

Just like when you tried to describe Larskros circuit to me, you claimed that the red led would bias on at 1v and that the battery was powering the led directly. You change common values and data just to suit your side of the story in argument.
You admitted then that you didnt remember for sure on the 1v red led as it was 30 some years ago.  More selective memory? When need be?  Or maybe you fully knew that the red led could not possibly be biased on with a 1.2v batt and....  na couldnt be.  8)

Well, now we will pay a bit more attn to when you say you dont remember somethings, and we will be able to judge whether you have selective memory or not because we will pay more attn to the specifics from now on. :o ;)

And you tell these guys they are out of their minds? And "That to me sounds like bend-over-ass-backwards Rossi fanboy talk."  Thats pretty bold from someone who doesnt remember the specifics, to the ones that do know the specifics.



And as for the radiation, why does it sound so impossible to get the ecat approved, when its ok for children to heat up a hot pocket in the microwave, in the kitchen, of the home?

Idiot

Mags


MileHigh

Mags:

You are getting proficient at word salads also.  I owned up to my mistake, what more do you want?  I don't retain everything I read about Rossi because I am not 'mentally engaged' with the whole deal.

My main points questioning Rossi's integrity and his veracity come from Rosssi's actions himself, and I haven't heard any cogent arguments to defend him.  Instead all I hear is spoiled-sport complaining abut me.  This has happened in the past also.

QuoteIdiot

Remember I discussed a circuit with a power supply and a single component - just one lousy component?  You couldn't answer my question about that circuit.  Instead, it started to sound like you were parroting all the things I tried to teach you and others on OUR.  So perhaps it never sunk in but you can parrot a few sentences?  So you knock 'em dead with all of your experimentation Mags.  It will be our little secret that you don't really know what you are doing.

MileHigh

Rosemary Ainslie

Hi guys,  I see this thread is getting its own share of 'dampening'.  And correspondingly I see that Harti's readership levels are falling from that earlier all time high.  I'm not sure that any opinions matter quite frankly.  What Chess is giving us is a regular FACTUAL update.  And what MileHigh is trying to do is throw cold water on all that good news.  Since that water is not going to make a blind bit of difference to the strong interest we all have in the E-cat and any similar - then perhaps one should just ignore that water - or better still - enjoy it. 

Chess - your efforts and commitment - as ever.  LAUDABLE AND MUCH APPRECIATED.  This is still my 'retreat' when the going gets tough.  So.  THANK YOU.  All of you who actually contribute to this.  I am entirely satisfied that LENR or COLD FUSION - or call it what you will - this technology will launch us into a new age of physics.  And more to the point it will salvage us from those excesses that we've indulged in the use of fossil and nuclear energy.  So.  It's about as worthwhile a cause as is possible.

I STILL do not understand why the nay sayers bother?  Is it really likely to make a difference?  I just can't see it.  With undeveloped technology they can still do damage.  But SURELY not when it's at the stage of development that Rossi's taken it.  Chess?  Is there some explanation for this?  Could it be an agenda?  Or is it just sheer bloody minded determination to DEPRESS every one who engages here? 

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary