FIRST FREE ENERGY DEVICE REACHES MARKET IN OCTOBER -- The Game Changer is Here

[chessnyt]

@Everyone:
The latest waves of attack concerning the E-Cat appears to be in the form of fear mongering.  We certainly have seen our share of this tactic used here.

Hank Mills wrote a recent article about this very tactic being used across the internet to try and muddy the waters for the arrival of the E-Cat onto the scene.  Here's an excerpt:

More and more often I read statements like.....

"Do you really want a nuclear reactor in your back yard?"

"What if one of these devices produced a nuclear explosion during testing?"

"Does anyone know where Rossi is testing his E-Cats? I don't want to be anywhere close!"

"What about the radiation produced by these systems? If he is producing kilowatts of power the gamma radiation could kill everyone!"

Statements similar to the above are being spread across the internet by what appears to me to be desperate individuals determined to try and spread fear about the E-Cat, and slow the commercialization of the technology. They seem to be operating with an agenda to spread FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) to muddy the waters enough to disrupt the rapid progress that is taking place.

However it is not going to work because their fear mongering is obvious, and the E-Cat technology is inherently safe. In fact, it is safer than many technologies already on the market, and several devices you can already purchase at any local hardware store.

The full article can be found here:
http://pesn.com/2012/06/28/9602119_Desperate_E-Cat_Dectractors_Spreading_False_Safety_Concerns/

Regards,

Chess

[Magluvin]

However it is not going to work because their fear mongering is obvious, and the E-Cat technology is inherently safe. In fact, it is safer than many technologies already on the market, and several devices you can already purchase at any local hardware store.

The full article can be found here:
http://pesn.com/2012/06/28/9602119_Desperate_E-Cat_Dectractors_Spreading_False_Safety_Concerns/

Regards,

Chess

The thing is, the fear tactics do work. Just not on everyone. They hope for a majority.

And kids today, they think drones are cool. You can buy your kid an RC drone with high def cameras. They will be numb to the idea that the real drones will be watching and killing.  "Just like the video game Dad."  Yea. Simple brain wash.

Ats just the way it is Chess. At least some realize it. ;]  And some will never get it.

Mags

[MileHigh]

The simple truth is that you can't say one way or the other because nobody knows how the device allegedly works.  And Hank Mills is a big-time fan-boy of Rossi.  So grand sweeping statements that proclaim that the technology is safe and grand sweeping statements that proclaim that the technology is dangerous are both wrong.  Just use your common sense.

Certainly people can speculate as long as they clearly indicate that they are speculating.

In a related matter, there are lots of grand sweeping statements that proclaim that "we are going to destroy most or all life on Earth if we don't come up with an alternative energy source soon" are nothing but politically correct propagandizing and parroting.  Life on Earth is extremely robust and if changes happen, even major changes, then life will adapt and find a new balance.

MileHigh

[chessnyt]

The simple truth is that you can't say one way or the other because nobody knows how the device allegedly works.  And Hank Mills is a big-time fan-boy of Rossi.  So grand sweeping statements that proclaim that the technology is safe and grand sweeping statements that proclaim that the technology is dangerous are both wrong.  Just use your common sense.

Certainly people can speculate as long as they clearly indicate that they are speculating.

In a related matter, there are lots of grand sweeping statements that proclaim that "we are going to destroy most or all life on Earth if we don't come up with an alternative energy source soon" are nothing but politically correct propagandizing and parroting.  Life on Earth is extremely robust and if changes happen, even major changes, then life will adapt and find a new balance.

MileHigh

@MileHigh:
This may be what you sincerely believe but I have news for you.  You are sincerely wrong!  This premise is completely and utterly false.  WE DO IN FACT POSSESS THE ABILITY TO MAKE THIS PLANET UNINHABITABLE FOR ALL HUMANS AND ANIMALS ALIKE.  This is a well known and undisputed fact (with the exception of yourself) that is absolutely true.

Without even going into all of the various types of pollution that destroy life, I'll just state one which shall suffice.

Nuclear technology is able to destroy this planet in such a way that it would be uninhabitable for 100's (if not thousands) of years alone.  We do indeed have the ability to destroy our environment and completely ruin this planet contrary to your false information being presented above.

As you state "Life on Earth is extremely robust and if changes happen, even major changes, then life will adapt and find a new balance.", life can not adapt to every change that we as human beings are able to make no matter how ROBUST you claim life on Earth is.


Chess

[Gwandau]

In a related matter, there are lots of grand sweeping statements that proclaim that "we are going to destroy most or all life on Earth if we don't come up with an alternative energy source soon" are nothing but politically correct propagandizing and parroting.  Life on Earth is extremely robust and if changes happen, even major changes, then life will adapt and find a new balance.

MileHigh

MileHigh,

that's quite a statement.

Do you have information that the rest of us here on earth does not have?

Then please give us data on the upper limits of what an eco system can take before breaking down.

The whole world will be thankful for your knowledge.

Gwandau