another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Magluvin]

 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Thanks for posting the text.  Magsy - there's no question that Poynty's 'against' over unity.  And I'm inclined to think that MileHigh may be as well.  LOL.  Peterae tries to put in the odd word in support of this - now and again.  But you're right.  But what's scarey is that I'm not sure there are ANY forums that the owners actively support this.  I think the support is ALWAYS for 'debatable' values.  NEVER for conclusive proof.  I'd give my eye teeth to know why they expend all that energy aimed at so much negativity.

Rosie.

[Magluvin]

I think Stephan is a good guy.  I think when he questions you of some things, you might have a bit of skepticism of his motives. But I believe he is just trying to get some points straight.  In reality, if he has a prize to be awarded, then his rules to obtaining it are solid.

Dont take this badly. ;]
 
Like the request of the 555 timer circuit. Why wont you post it? I would be interested in seeing it also.  Just saying you have covered it, is kinda saying that he has to go back through all of the threads to find it.

Ive had that done to me in requests of previous info. But I dont do that. I most always will repost info again so that all may see easily what they may have missed without having to work hard for it.  ;] After all, it is up to me to prove beyond a shaddow what I am talking about, and if reposting gets things done faster, then I will do it. ;]

I know you have some criteria as to what when and how you reveal  answers to requests, these criteria may be impeding your ability to move forward.

;]

Mags

[poynt99]

What IS your problem magluvin?

Clearly you misunderstood what I said, and now you are trying to make it appear as though I don't support FE research. You've taken this out of context and not posted my reply, which clarifies for you how you should have understood it. Clearly you had an agenda and were looking for anything to use against OUR.

You are wrong. Now, are you going to make this right and post the rest of that conversation?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I think Stephan is a good guy.  I think when he questions you of some things, you might have a bit of skepticism of his motives. But I believe he is just trying to get some points straight.  In reality, if he has a prize to be awarded, then his rules to obtaining it are solid.

Why - if he's a 'good guy' does he take Glen off moderation?  And then allow those posts of his?  Where everyone tries to knock the technology - Glen shouts over the entire thread and his accusations are pure calumny and so far out of line as to be actionable.  Yet Harti does nothing?
 

Like the request of the 555 timer circuit. Why wont you post it? I would be interested in seeing it also.  Just saying you have covered it, is kinda saying that he has to go back through all of the threads to find it.

It is NOT my work to post.  I would need to engage one of the collaborators.  And they have ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST in engaging on these forums.  I've explained this.

Ive had that done to me in requests of previous info. But I dont do that. I most always will repost info again so that all may see easily what they may have missed without having to work hard for it.  ;] After all, it is up to me to prove beyond a shaddow what I am talking about, and if reposting gets things done faster, then I will do it. ;]

I have NOT posted details of the work.  There's nothing to find.  I may have posted the screen download.  But can't swear to it.  I've got one waveform that could be right but it shows 3 batteries and - from memory we used two.  Quite apart from which I'm more than willing to do the ONLY test that may prove this conclusively.  One would have thought that it's relatively easy for Prof Jones and/or Poynty to find academics to approve those protocols.  I've done my bit Mags.  Above and beyond.  Why should I do more.  We've posted CONCLUSIVE proof related to measurements.  Where else has any OU claim been as thoroughly reported?  And WHY then is this fact being so HEAVILY discounted.  From where I sit there's an agenda.  Under usual circumstances there would be some acknowledgement.  But all that SCORN?  AND NOTHING ELSE? WHY?

I know you have some criteria as to what when and how you reveal  answers to requests, these criteria may be impeding your ability to move forward.

I have NO criteria.  I don't even know what you mean.  The ONLY thing that this thread was restarted for was to challenge Poynty and Prof Jones for their prizes - and that only to assure our readers that our results are DEFINITIVE.  They've both gone to some considerable lengths to deny this.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary