another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

What IS your problem magluvin?

Clearly you misunderstood what I said, and now you are trying to make it appear as though I don't support FE research. You've taken this out of context and not posted my reply, which clarifies for you how you should have understood it. Clearly you had an agenda and were looking for anything to use against OUR.

You are wrong. Now, are you going to make this right and post the rest of that conversation?

Poynty Point,

Are you seriously proposing to advance any kind of belief that you have an interest in Over Unity on THIS thread?  Just look again at your contributions.  From where I sit you have NO argument against our numbers.  Nor have you even attempted to explain that waveform.  There was and is clear evidence that you are more anxious to dismiss the claim than argue it.  And those sad little arguments that you proposed are seriously wanting in scientific justification.  Why are your 'friends' not pointing this out?  Are they colluding?  With your agenda?

Regards
Rosemary

AND WHAT IS THIS NEED TO KEEP ME AND POSSIBLY OTHERS OUT OF YOUR FORUM DISCUSSIONS.  ARE YOU OPEN SOURCE OR WHAT?

AND MORE TO THE POINT - WHY ARE YOU NOT DOING EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO PROMOTE THAT DEFINITIVE TEST.  You KNOW academics - or you claim to know them.  Then ask them to support the require protocols.  I'll define the required.  They only need to endorse it.  SIMPLE.

[fuzzytomcat]

 I'm so glad there is one of the three faithful readers of Rosemary's that can actually do "MATH" ...... what a relief ......

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg314918/#msg314918   Reply #820 on: March 10, 2012, 04:41:20 AM

I am just sick of all the MIB-wannabes trying to suppress the Ainslie technology.  She needs support so she can bring this to market.  This technology is lifechanging for  the world.

Here is a mathematical problems Rosemary has refused countless times to verify that her summation is "INCORRECT" as "ALL" other OU members here have indicated .....

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg292920/#msg292920    Reply #1644 on: June 27, 2011, 04:46:37 AM

Rosemary Ainslie "Quote"

NOW.  Let's look at your 'self-runner' demands.  We have never recharged those batteries - with one exception.  Two caught fire and BOTH were fully recharged.  We've had those batteries since January 2010.  We've been running them since August 2010.  I've now FINALLY checked their rated capacities.  They're 40 ampere hours each.  We've used 6 of them continually since that time.  According to this rating they are each able, theoretically to dissipate 12 volts x 40 amps x 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 1 hour x 6 batteries.  That gives a work potential -  a total potential output of 10 368 000 JOULES.

According to what has been carefully established it takes 4.18 Joules to raise 1 gram of water by 1 degree centigrade.  We've taken a little under 900 grams of water to 82 degrees centigrade.  We ran that test for 90 minutes.  Then we upped the frequency and took that water up a further 20 degrees to 104.  We ran that part of the test for 10 minutes.  Ambient was at 16.  Joules = 1 watt per second.  So.  Do the math.  4.18 x 900 grams x (82 - 16) 66 degrees C = 248 292 joules x 90 minutes of the test period =  22 342 280 joules.  Then ADD the last 10 minutes where the water was taken to boil and now you have 4.18 x 900 grams x (104 - 16) 88 degrees C = 331 156 joules per second x 10 minutes =  3 310 560 Joules.  Then add those two values 22 342 280 + 3 310 560 =  25.6 Million Joules.  All 5 batteries maximum potential output - available for work - is  10.3 Million Joules. In that test alone the battery outperformed its watt hour rating.  And that was just one test.  Now.  Over the 10 month period that those batteries have been running at various outputs - which, when added to the output on just this one test - then I think its safe to say that the evidence is conclusive.  Those batteries have outperformed. They are still at OVER 12 volts EACH.  They are all of them still FULLY CHARGED.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The challenge being that Rosemary concludes her "MATHEMATICAL DATA" is correct and "REFUSES" to verify the facts as stated in the QUOTE above.

Please, do the math verification of the "TOTAL SUMS" in GREEN as listed above ....

We will then verify "YOUR" findings and "IF" Rosemary is correct.


FuzzyTomCat

[poynt99]

Forget it Magluvin,

We've deleted that thread as well. I've pm'd Stefan advising him to remove your post here.

[poynt99]

Poynty Point,

Are you seriously proposing to advance any kind of belief that you have an interest in Over Unity on THIS thread?

Rosemary, are you ever going to understand what's going on around you? No, I was not making any statement in reference to THIS thread. My comment was in reference to supporting FE research in general, which I DO. RTFP.

Magluvin carelessly saw fit to take a comment I made (which he misunderstood) out of context and post it here with mal-intent. So I had to respond HERE...get it?

[Magluvin]

Just got off of the phone with my mom. Havnt talked in a couple weeks. Her Yellow Nape 25 yrs old has cancer. Priorities....

Poynt,  the thread is gone, so how can I post it? Was there a problem with it that it needed erasing? If you have a copy, you can post it. But then we would have to say, hmmm, is it now modified? So posting it is useless. ;] Hmm, maybe I have a whole copy. ;]  Maybe I dont. ;]

Now, can you tell us if I do or I dont? ;]

Poynt, when I read that, and the thread, I can see the attitude towards John. I dont see it as respectful. Now that the thread is gone, I cant show any of it, no more than I have already right? ;]

And with Rose, If, IF you know she is wrong about all of this, then why is it that you continuously follow her to ridicule and discredit her, when you have done it all before? For how long now? What do you requirer from her, in this lifetime, that you will finally be at peace with this? Obsessed? Little voices?

If you had the manners and show of professional attitude such as the Prof in all of this, I and some others would not be taking a neck jerk second glance at what is happening here. 3 readers, get real.

Is that so Stephan? Only 3 readers of this thread?   

Ya know what Poynt, all this bashing has me thinking maybe she has something. Like why are these guys always after Rose with forks in tongue?  Maybe thats the only reason you, TK, Mh, kitty cats and the others are always spending THIS amount of time doing so.  And so little time trying to actually work TOWARDS FE possibilities. Whether Rose is right or wrong, all of THIS, years of negativity toward an FE hopeful, can discourage others from the idea that FE possibly exists. Or do you disagree on that?  When have any of you guys worked on a project in actual hopes of FE, and not just to disprove, ? I dont see anything.

If not for that reason, then it is just fun for you all. That will get you lots of respect. Keep up the great work fellas, were all rootin fer ya.

Now to Rose.....     next post....

Mags