another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRYEdJB6bVg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZbkhWalRIs

This is YOUR circuit, Rosemary, using an FG as shown in your diagram and in the video Glen linked. May I remind you that you have NOT shown any 555 timer results of sufficient detail for consideration--- so let's compare my small apples with your bigger ones, not with your grapefruit which we haven't seen.

You can't claim that the mosfet type or the voltage makes any difference until you or somebody else actually shows it. Meanwhile the fact that my scope traces duplicate yours show that the mosfet types DON'T matter at least to first order. And "noise" does not have the sharp voltage envelope that this feedback oscillation has. You will note, maybe, that in both your oscillations and mine, the voltage levels aren't random but oscillate around fixed values and the oscillation is quite sinusoidal when expanded. It's not noise as noise is generally defined.

But we know how you are about general definitions.

Quoting Rosemary in one of her famous ex cathedra pronouncements:

Correctly it is one Joule per second - but since 1 watt = 1 Joule and since 1 Joule = 1 watt per second - then AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER - the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE.  Which is ALSO explained in WIKI.

You are right about one thing: You are too old to be wasting your brief remaining time on this Earth pushing this nonsense.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK9TNFuvM2k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZbkhWalRIs

This is YOUR circuit, Rosemary, using an FG as shown in your diagram and in the video Glen linked. May I remind you that you have NOT shown any 555 timer results of sufficient detail for consideration--- so let's compare my small apples with your bigger ones, not with your grapefruit which we haven't seen.

You are right about one thing: You are too old to be wasting your brief remaining time on this Earth pushing this nonsense.

Our circuit is NOT your circuit.  Our results are NOT your results.  Our claims are NOT your claims.  I am under no obligation to show you anything at all.  Nor will I.  But Poynty Point and others have done some valuable work on simulations.  And you really don't need to look much further than that.  The problem is that you cannot see for 'looking' and I'm getting rather tired of trying to guide you. 

And I will do PRECISELY what I wish with my life.  I think that I'll start by ignoring your advice.  I suspect it's loaded with the desire that I stop claiming COP INFINITY - when your own life is dedicated to denying this.  We're fighting the same war TK.  We're just on different sides.

Rosemary 

[TinselKoala]

Stop making claims that aren't true and that you can't support with experimental evidence. Stop trying to teach physics and math to people who have actually spent time in schools studying the subjects. Stop wasting your own and other people's time by playing on their naive hopes and wishes.

That's what I want you to stop, Rosemary.

Oh... and I think you cut and pasted too soon. That's not the video I intended to link, sorry for the confusion. Check the post again for the correct videos. And at least delay a bit so it seems as though you've had time to watch them and think about them... even though I doubt you will.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You've been editing TK.  Golly.  Let me address this as well.

You can't claim that the mosfet type or the voltage makes any difference until you or somebody else actually shows it.

That's not true.  Any scientist can claim anything they like.  The trick is to back it up with evidence.  I will be more than happy to do this when I finally prepare the protocols for our definitive 'draw down tests'. 

Meanwhile the fact that my scope traces duplicate yours show that the mosfet types DON'T matter at least to first order.

Why should this matter?  It's something that I've been advocating from the kick off.

And "noise" does not have the sharp voltage envelope that this feedback oscillation has.

It most certainly DOES.  It is simply better evidenced the better the resolution of the scope.

You will note, maybe, that in both your oscillations and mine, the voltage levels aren't random but oscillate around fixed values and the oscillation is quite sinusoidal when expanded. It's not noise as noise is generally defined.

WHICH oscillation are you referring to?  The one with the battery disconnected?  When it goes into full on square wave a/c voltage?  LOL.  Or the one where you manage to find 1 volt over 3 where we show typically 90 over 36?

But we know how you are about general definitions.

Indeed.  I tend to get a bit pedantic.

Let me know if you're going to add to that post of yours again.  I'd be sorry to miss anything.

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My dear TK.  STOP trying to tell me what to do with my life or what to think or what to say.  I'm rather fond of my freedoms - and our own constitution allows for this - as well as yours.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie