another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[fuzzytomcat]

Thanks fuzzy, for the absolute proof that Ainslie is a liar with a poor memory to boot. But the internet never forgets.

The video was posted to YouTube on the 22nd of March 2011.  The video was mentioned by Rosemary and linked from Rosemary's own blog on the 22nd of March 2011.

And now she says she didn't post it, it has nothing to do with her claims, it was "rifled" from her photobucket account, etc.

Yes, Wilby, at this point it is safe to assume that EVERYTHING Rosemary says is a lie, until proven otherwise.

Hi Tk,

Not only did Rosemary forget the BLOG posting of hers ...... There's a nice and clear posting here at OU   

Rosemary's Quote -

http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg278833/#msg278833    Reply #210 on: March 22, 2011, 05:19:17 AM

Guys, finally the video.  Apologies for the delays.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyOmoGluMCc

Looks like "STRIKE THREE"  !!!!

FTC

   

[WilbyInebriated]

I think I get it now.

no. you obviously don't. you don't think i should point out the fact that most of the "verbiage" is tinselkoala/alsetalokin's doing. and/or the reason for his "verbiage" is his obsession with rosemary. if you have a problem with people pointing out the facts of a matter under discussion then i care not what you think...

You are a troll.

typical lawyer... engaging in fallacious rhetoric instead of logic.

[eatenbyagrue]

typical lawyer... engaging in fallacious rhetoric instead of logic.

Nah, I just used evidence.  Taking a suggestion, I looked at your post history.  For the most part, you just pick fights with people for no apparent goal except to fight.  By that I mean that it is not even clear that you are disagreeing with the thrust of the person's post, you will just go on any tangent looking for conflict.

I suggest you stick to whatever your $125 per hour pissant job is.  Those are slave wages in my book.

[WilbyInebriated]

Nah, I just used evidence.  Taking a suggestion, I looked at your post history.  For the most part, you just pick fights with people for no apparent goal except to fight.  By that I mean that it is not even clear that you are disagreeing with the thrust of the person's post, you will just go on any tangent looking for conflict.

nice strawman. no. you did not. your whole post to me was nothing more than a hodgepodge of logical fallacies... go count the number of posts by tinselkoala/alsetalokin since the thread has been re-opened and compare those to the amount by rosemary. see who the blame for the "verbiage" falls upon as evidenced by the record. but then facts about that matter don't really concern you do they counselor? tinselkoala/alsetalokin can make whatever sweeping generalizations he chooses to and engage in gross hyperbole along with all your favorite logical fallacies... and never mind the facts.

I suggest you stick to whatever your $125 per hour pissant job is.  Those are slave wages in my book.

no. they are not. you are no lawyer. that much is obvious.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Just a little update to the circuit diagram.  Rosemary has alleged that the diagram below is a "gross misrepresentation" without backing up her claim.
I stand by this diagram and will state that I believe it to be correct.  I am challenging Rosemary to explain how the diagram is allegedly a "gross misrepresentation."
Again:  In negatively offset oscillation mode all of the NERD team's DSO measurements are junk - they are garbage data.

Hello MileHigh

I assure you that this circuit represents a gross misrepresentation of the NERD circuit that supports our claim.  But I realise why you rely on it. I just hope that everyone else does.  If you want to refer to the correct circuit then refer to our paper.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary