another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You cant even spell my name right  as to asking me to do anything for you .... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA .... do it your self "SUPER TROLL" your in such great terms with CUPT !!!

Anyway you and your attorneys can read all about it here, with all the rest of your BS .... http://www.opensourceresearchanddevelopment.org/scamsshams.html   ( when I'm done )

FTC

I am NOT super troll.  But it does seem that I'm at least able to fight you trolls.  Not sure that I'll win.  But I'll put up some kind of resistance while I'm still breathing.

Delighted to see that you're preparing yet another link.  And equally pleased to see that you're amused - even if it's not entirely convincing.

Rosie Pose

sorry.  Have I not spelled your name correctly?  I thought it was Glen Lettenmaier?  I'll check it out and do better in future.

[fuzzytomcat]

I am NOT super troll.  But it does seem that I'm at least able to fight you trolls.  Not sure that I'll win.  But I'll put up some kind of resistance while I'm still breathing.

Delighted to see that you're preparing yet another link.  And equally pleased to see that you're amused - even if it's not entirely convincing.

Rosie Pose

sorry.  Have I not spelled your name correctly?  I thought it was Glen Lettenmaier?  I'll check it out and do better in future.

That link has always been there .... understandable as my web site looks for fraudulent claims, and you would stay away as far as possible ..... OH YA !!! ..... you refused to show your COP>INFINITY device there at my site , to bad to sad for you! 

You can have a preview of my legal notes - Open Source Research and Development Web Site Agreement  http://www.opensourceresearchanddevelopment.org/Contact.html

Cheers

[Rosemary Ainslie]

That link has always been there .... understandable as my web site looks for fraudulent claims, and you would stay away as far as possible ..... OH YA !!! ..... you refused to show your COP>INFINITY device there at my site , to bad to sad for you! 

You can have a preview of my legal notes - Open Source Research and Development Web Site Agreement  http://www.opensourceresearchanddevelopment.org/Contact.html

Cheers

LOL  It's a hell of a thing when I'm also obliged to tolerate your spamming.  There's nothing in that link other than a whole lot of intentions.  And  some questionable assumptions of an authority to comment at all about over unity matters.  I think you're rather disqualified until you delete your 'claims' as stated in that paper of ours that you've stolen.

In any event.  We were none of us expecting any serious contributions from you Glen Lettenmaier.  If you want it to be taken seriously you'll need to learn how to behave professionally.  First off.  One does not, as a rule, publish confidential emails - one does not as a rule steal papers that one has not written - one does not as a rule menace the public with threats of litigation that you do not intend to carry through - one does not as a rule pepper every post with calumny that would be enough to sink even the reputation of Mother Theresa - and one does not as a rule try and engage in any kind of discourse without some elementary language skills.

Rosemary

[fuzzytomcat]

LOL  It's a hell of a thing when I'm also obliged to tolerate your spamming.  There's nothing in that link other than a whole lot of intentions.  And  some questionable assumptions of an authority to comment at all about over unity matters.  I think you're rather disqualified until you delete your 'claims' as stated in that paper of ours that you've stolen.

In any event.  We were none of us expecting any serious contributions from you Glen Lettenmaier.  If you want it to be taken seriously you'll need to learn how to behave professionally.  First off.  One does not, as a rule, publish confidential emails - one does not as a rule steal papers that one has not written - one does not as a rule menace the public with threats of litigation that you do not intend to carry through - one does not as a rule pepper every post with calumny that would be enough to sink even the reputation of Mother Theresa - and one does not as a rule try and engage in any kind of discourse without some elementary language skills.

Rosemary

Rosemary I could care less what you think I do with e-mails addressed to me and I'll do what I wish with them unless somehow specifically requested not to publish them, and majority rules. You are by far "NO" professional and I will not treat you as such, so dream on some more and have your maid wake you in a hour.

Second I've posted this controversy with your so called papers ... http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg317659/#msg317659  Reply #1692 on: April 04, 2012, 08:07:35 PM

Experimental Evidence of a Breach of Unity on Switched Circuit Apparatus ( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )
Proposed variation to Faraday’s Lines of Force to include a magnetic dipole in its structure ( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )


Are you having a hard time reading your own work there ?? Can you possibly understand what DATES are ?? How about which DATE comes first , second ..... etc. etc. ?? Please, answer or comment on these concerns are you capable of this ??

Your so called paper(s) documentation and collection of information is WRONG !! If not prove it without a reasonable doubt ... can you do that ??

Then do a new test without using a function generator using a 555 timer circuit, do a battery draw down test that is fully documented, video taped and can be verified 100% of the tests actually being done. This has been requested several times by Stefan .... you know who Stefan is ??

Stop screwing around and do something right for once in your lifetime.


Cheers,
FTC

[powercat]

Hello MileHigh

I assure you that we have a level of support that is both surprising and welcome.  The only joke is the transparent efforts by you and TK to detract from this technology.  And my personal knowledge is more than sufficient for the purposes of explaining every aspect of this rather simple circuit

What level of support....where...... everyone is free to post here yet no one comes to your defence showing everyone there working replication of your claim.

Everyone with any intelligent can see you made a mathematical error and yet you continue to insist that your claim is true.

You accuse others of detracting and debunking your technology yet you do nothing to change the situation, like those new tests.............YOU ARE DEBUNKING yourself

O of course you have so many excuses why you can't do new tests and you continuously blame other people when you are the one that needs to prove your case,the rest of us including the "guys" know your claim is Based on an error.

At some point this thread will probably be closed and of course you will blame other people for your inadequacies and the more you go on having pointless arguments and not doing any tests the more you prove you have nothing but a false claim