Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Video On line, Proof Of Overunity With Permanent Magnets, LaFonte Research

Started by gammarayburst, November 29, 2011, 10:26:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

This is the reason why your experiment probably will fail. A small magnet will limit the ability to separate the iron parts if the iron parts is bigger than the magnet. In this case the iron parts attract each other. If the magnet was much wider, the iron parts would separate until maximum attraction occours between the magnet and the two iron parts. At that point the magnet will not freely move on to the next iron parts in order to separate them too.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhWjn7Dy5Sw



Vidar

broli

Quote from: Low-Q on December 06, 2011, 09:14:32 AM
This is the reason why your experiment probably will fail. A small magnet will limit the ability to separate the iron parts if the iron parts is bigger than the magnet. In this case the iron parts attract each other. If the magnet was much wider, the iron parts would separate until maximum attraction occours between the magnet and the two iron parts. At that point the magnet will not freely move on to the next iron parts in order to separate them too.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhWjn7Dy5Sw



Vidar

Vidar you are correct in your setup. But it has been discussed for a while that it's better to use an air gap with a strong uniform field. Since the field is mostly directed in one direction you wouldn't have the issue you show where the field lines disperse too strongly causing a situation where the iron attracts. I recommend you redo the experiment with a setup where you contain the magnetic field with a C type core.

gammarayburst

Quote from: broli on December 06, 2011, 10:36:55 AM
Vidar you are correct in your setup. But it has been discussed for a while that it's better to use an air gap with a strong uniform field. Since the field is mostly directed in one direction you wouldn't have the issue you show where the field lines disperse too strongly causing a situation where the iron attracts. I recommend you redo the experiment with a setup where you contain the magnetic field with a C type core.
Look at our videos of tests Mark did on the bars seperating. Youtube, lafonte research
Thanks,
Butch

gammarayburst

Quote from: Low-Q on December 06, 2011, 09:14:32 AM
This is the reason why your experiment probably will fail. A small magnet will limit the ability to separate the iron parts if the iron parts is bigger than the magnet. In this case the iron parts attract each other. If the magnet was much wider, the iron parts would separate until maximum attraction occours between the magnet and the two iron parts. At that point the magnet will not freely move on to the next iron parts in order to separate them too.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhWjn7Dy5Sw



Vidar
Totally non-related to our design.
Butch

Low-Q

Quote from: broli on December 06, 2011, 10:36:55 AM
Vidar you are correct in your setup. But it has been discussed for a while that it's better to use an air gap with a strong uniform field. Since the field is mostly directed in one direction you wouldn't have the issue you show where the field lines disperse too strongly causing a situation where the iron attracts. I recommend you redo the experiment with a setup where you contain the magnetic field with a C type core.
Yes, maybe that will make a difference. I can try to simulate it too also. With the same magnet as in the video, I could separate two hex-wrench which has center-center much closer than the iron powder pieces.


Vidar