Video On line, Proof Of Overunity With Permanent Magnets, LaFonte Research

[powercat]

If we get a self runner, it will go on public display full time, around the clock, seven days a week.
Butch

If

why are you saying that, your title says   (Proof Of Overunity With Permanent Magnets)

I look forward to seeing your working device.

[Cloxxki]

why are you saying that, your title says   (Proof Of Overunity With Permanent Magnets)

I look forward to seeing your working device.

I asked someone claiming on Twitter to get the plans working in two days if any reputable builder ever managed. Of course, no response.

Every inventor sets its own standards for proof. None seems to ever be interested to use existing ones accepted by a large group of peers, calling them uneducated or something similar.


Seriously, if I can be explained an OU magnet concept, I am quite confident that I can design a self-runner for it, in a matter of hours if not minutes.
The way I see an OU magnet concept, the gain will be so significant, that half my humble IQ would suffice to make a self-runner.
When you show a 10 year old child. "Here I show you how to hold magnets, such that they move by themselves without getting stuck. Now here is all the Lego you want. Build a self-running engine, and you get to keep all the Lego.
You won't have time to set up your camera to record the design process. It will be right there and then.


I cannot believe that a grown man will invent an OU technology which is all mechanical (magnets), post video's labeled proof, and then need weeks, months, years, to get it past the 1 cycle threshold. I think the LaFonte team is being too easy on itself.

[gammarayburst]

I cannot believe that a grown man will invent an OU technology which is all mechanical (magnets), post video's labeled proof, and then need weeks, months, years, to get it past the 1 cycle threshold. I think the LaFonte team is being too easy on itself.

One of the things I was taught growing up to become a "grown man" was that when getting in a debate that adults with good manners gave their full name before the debate began. I apologize if your screen name is your full name.
Butch LaFonte

[Low-Q]

Totally non-related to our design.
Butch

I understand your design. You can separate metal pieces with a magnet. You want to make a chain of pieces so the magnet can separate them in order.


However, there is a problem with the design. When you have an array of metal pieces, the pieces that is located in front and behind the magnets will be magnetized in a way that they attract the next pair in the chain. This attraction will partially prevent you from separating the metal pieces that is located right between the magnets. The metal pieces right between the magnets will drag with them the previous and the next metal piece pairs also. THis will prevent a full space between the pieces, and also reduce the attraction to the next pair in order to separate them too.


It is simple to test, if you haven't already, I am sure you will find this out sooner or later.


Unfortunatly I have no good idea to come around the problem. I'll think about it.


Vidar

[gammarayburst]

I understand your design. You can separate metal pieces with a magnet. You want to make a chain of pieces so the magnet can separate them in order.


However, there is a problem with the design. When you have an array of metal pieces, the pieces that is located in front and behind the magnets will be magnetized in a way that they attract the next pair in the chain. This attraction will partially prevent you from separating the metal pieces that is located right between the magnets. The metal pieces right between the magnets will drag with them the previous and the next metal piece pairs also. THis will prevent a full space between the pieces, and also reduce the attraction to the next pair in order to separate them too.

Please look at the pendulum video mark did and you will see that there is no problem what so ever with the design. In fact the main power comes from the attraction of the magnet to the next closed set.
Please look at our video's on our youtube web site, lafonte research.
Butch

It is simple to test, if you haven't already, I am sure you will find this out sooner or later.


Unfortunatly I have no good idea to come around the problem. I'll think about it.


Vidar