A thought about Tesla and the TPU

[pauldude000]

It has been over a year (I think), since I retired from the TPU research. I started hitting dead end after dead end, yet the results of various experiments were promising enough to keep me going. I instinctively knew that Tesla tied into the matter (not surprising really), but I could not quite figure out how..... I had to clear my head and take a break.


Only SM knows for sure, but I wonder of the TPU was an accident..... I am not joking. Say you are looking at a patent for a Tesla device employing a rotational field toroidal transformer, but in replication you try to use copper wires instead of soft iron wires?


More guesses than facts circulate around the device (of which I was as guilty as anyone). Prejudices based upon pet hypothesis and following theory make for a nasty mix. They cloud your judgement and wreck your ability for emotionally detached logical thought and evaluation. After my head cleared..... I started over, tossing out most every assumption I had previously held, or had been told by others. I re-read all of SM's posts carefully to see exactly what HE said and meant, not what interpretations I or anyone else placed upon his words.


I found that he was actually quite clear, and that someone else was occasionally posing as him. (People have a distinct writing style, grammar, word usage etc.... like a written fingerprint.) Some matched, others were 180 degrees out of phase so to speak.


facts:


SM stated plainly that the fields were rotating, and that the rotation was necessary to the operation


SM stated there was a kick, then specifically pointed out the inrush current from the book he cited as the stated "kick"


SM pointed out TAO had the overall key (And he does I believe, through the winding pattern he developed and through his initial
presentation of his thoughts about Tesla.)


NOWHERE did SM agree with the statement TAO made about Tesla's wireless transmission of power tech being involved. THAT was assumed.


SM stated that the unit worked by making as many kicks (inrush current) as possible as fast as possible.


Out of nowhere an EE posts an anonymous letter to Mannix. To which SM (the real SM by writing style) agrees almost whole heartedly with every deduction the man makes, then points out several 'points of interest'.


What was a point of interest to me was that from the style of writing, I think SM himself may well be the hypothetical myterious EE as well.


After watching ALL the movies again, slowly, pausing and rewinding and paying as close an examination as possible.


I noticed a few interesting things off of the good quality vid I received from JDO300 way back..... exactly two sets of matched components in the center of the large TPU. Two large black caps with resistors in parallel on the inside periphery of the coil (very clear, I could almost ready the values) and in the very center two matching inductance coils with two matching caps close by......


I wondered why he would need two pairs each of matched RC and  LC tanks, then it hit me. More than one signal out of one input signal....
Q: How can you make AC out of DC?


A: Charge a capacitor in series with an inductance, then open the switch and shut the power off. The capacitor will discharge through the inductor to equalize charge across its plates as soon as the  forward voltage either reverses (AC)... or ceases (DC). The pair will resonate at a frequency governed by the values of the given components.


A nagging suspicion ate at me for awhile, then I loaded up the Tesla patent again, and examined the diagram closely, tracing the wires through the circuit on the transformer, then back to the generator in the circuit, asking the question "exactly what is the ELECTRICITY doing when this generator rotates through a cycle", not merely what the current was doing. I wanted to examine both current and voltage together.


My jaw hit the floor. The device in the patent is a rotating field transformer. Four coils make and rotate the field, and the outer coils 'generate the juice' so to speak.


Now, understand that the picture in the patent is only CLOSE to a TPU, but it is NOT the TPU.... (I will explain why, please be patient with me at this point.) 


Why two different type matching sets of resonance devices?


VOLTAGE PHASING.... 90 degree voltage phasing to be exact as the tesla patent demonstrated, using a single CLEAN dc square wave signal.  I was actually right about one thing, go figure. Transistors are a really noisy device that tend to amplify any abnormalities in the applied signal. The signal HAS to be as free of parasitic AC signals as possible, that is why tube rectifiers  REALLY are easier as SM said.


Tesla didn't need caps, as he treated every inductor as it should be treated, as a resonant device. Capacitance can be made by wire placement and spacing relationships. An EE views resonance as either a phase relationship, or as a purely mechanical function.  Telsa's concept of resonance was a little different, incorporating the 1/4 wave relationship between the propagating wave and its voltage. The classic case of two people referencing the same term, but using differing definitions. Tesla desired a relationship where the voltage was highest possible at one end of the wire coupled with an overall Z (impedance) as close to zero as possible allowing maximum current to flow.... When this condition is achieved, you see a LOT of energy available in the circuit.


Voltage, remember, is not energy. Neither is current. BOTH must be in motion for a state of usable electrical energy to exist. We have all seen the resonant phantom signal pushing hundreds of volts, yet would not light a fart, let alone a light bulb. The current was out of phase with the voltage, therefore little or no usable energy.


Tesla didn't need caps, but I DO.... and so did SM. you have four coils, one DC square wave signal at a given desired frequency, how do you rotate the field? Hint 90 180 270 360... you phase each of the voltages 90 degrees further from zero as the previous coil, using equal reactance components to achieve resonance at the input frequency, into a wire wound into a coil, the length of each wire being 1/4 wavelwength long..........


Anyone see what I see?


By the way..... you can generate juice using the "A" field in a toroidal unit.......... doesn't have to be magnetism doing the work you know, that is assumed. Interesting how coils 90 degrees out from each other can induce voltage and current in each other. (Collector to control amplification.)


I don't know enough about the "A" field to speak much about it. If someone is an expert, please give us all a heads up.


Paul Andrulis


P.S. I am using public wi-fi for this, and am not "online" right at the moment. I will read your thoughts as posted as soon as I can get back online.









Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

By the way, I am now officially back online.


Paul Andrulis

[sparks]

Welcome back Paul.  Been with litle free time myself for last couple of years or so.  I posted a theory (like whats new)  that electromagnetic radiation can experience a blue shift from the motion of the Earth itself.  I think that this is what powered the tpu gain.  The Earth's true velocity relative to the background cosmic radiation is 600km/s  so an emitted frequency can be collected at a higher frequency from this motion.  In fact this motion though much smaller than the speed of light is enough to abberate observations of distance and time for astronomers.  Sm might have just lucked on to creating a transmitter receiver device where the received frequency is higher than the transmitted.  The three frequencies in play would be the received-minus the emitted-gained frequency.  So your kick is a highamplitude low duration emission.  The received em from the kick is an even higher amplitude (compressed wave) than the emitted (time remaining constant).  These amplitude waves are what Tesla was working with.  He was going way the heck up there.  Like o to millions in infintesmial time.  I agree with your idea that SM was looking at Tesla's stuff and happened upon some anomalous gain.

[pauldude000]

The problems I see are twofold.... a matter of (1.) Q and (2.) back EMF.....


Consider these problems.


The Q of the system (Quality ratio. inductive reactance = capacitive reactance is Q=0) has to be as close to Q = 1 as possible for maximum current flow. Reactances are equivalent to resistance, and must be used to counter each other for gain. Q= 500 or 1000? easy peasy. Q = 1? Not so easy in practice.


Calculating exact inductance is extremely difficult on a home brew coil, and capacitance tends to be limited to on shelf component values with corresponding variances from stated values. Therefore calculating Q tends to be more of a hope and a prayer than an exact science.


Back EMF is the great inductive energy thief. A coil is much like a capacitor in that when a currant is applied, a field is stored in the device, and when the applied signal stops, the field converts back into 'electricity' as we call it, though flowing in opposition to the impressed signal. A capacitor does this using the electric field, and an inductance (a coil) uses the magnetic field.


Back EMF is the easiest to deal with. Look up 'bifilar' at Wikipedia. Has a  picture of Tesla's self inductance neutralizing 'bifilar' design, which does NOT match the common conceptions of a bifilar coil. It's design would kill back EMF deader than disco.


Its design is perfect for 2 conductor lamp cord..... 


Paul Andrulis

[Bob Smith]

Back EMF is the easiest to deal with. Look up 'bifilar' at Wikipedia. Has a  picture of Tesla's self inductance neutralizing 'bifilar' design, which does NOT match the common conceptions of a bifilar coil. It's design would kill back EMF deader than disco.

Its design is perfect for 2 conductor lamp cord..... 

Veeeery interesting...
This picture from the Wikipede article you cite is also in a very brief YT video (I think by CosmoLV - not sure) regarding one layer of winding on the Kapagen.
Bob