Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Not only free legal advice but you solicit it with all the finesse of a 5 year old.   I DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO.  IT DOES NOT REPRESENT OUR CLAIMS.  OUR CLAIM IS ONLY RELATED TO THE CLAIMS IN OUR PAPERS.  ALL OTHER WORK IS MERELY RELATED TO THAT CLAIM WHICH IS IN THAT PAPER. No amount of repeated allegation will change this until you manage to PROVE that I made that video publicly accessible.  When you've PROVED this - then LET ME KNOW.   

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg317526/#msg317526

and further in that thread.

Which is also why he relies on that video.  I must admit that I thought it was taken off the write up in Sterling Allen's blog.  It seems, in fact, that they've rifled it from my own photobucket.  No surprises.  They've forced themselves in there many times in the past.  But just as a reminder.

http://www.overunity.com/11675/another-small-breakthrough-on-our-nerd-technology/msg317551/#msg317551

[fuzzytomcat]

WHERE HAVE I EVER DENIED THIS?

This is too funny !!

Whats wrong "Dooziedont" or Rosemary Ann Ainslie .... you can't go back and edit out your comments at YouTube can you now .... LOL !!

The NERD RATS abandoned the magical vessel months ago and just like a good captain Dooziedont you go down with the ship all alone again !! 

[TinselKoala]

I think that from now on, the Dunning-Kruger effect should be known as the "Rosemary Ainslie Effect"... since it is real, and that other "effect" of hers isn't.

In fact, I think I'll write to Dunning and Kruger and let them know about this textbook example of their effect.

[TinselKoala]

All this time..... and we were supposed to be using this diagram, since it's the only one that seems to have come from Ainslie herself.
Preserved here for posterity:

[Rosemary Ainslie]

My dear TinselKoala

Your spin is unending and abysmal.  I freely and openly acknowledged that you took that video off my own youtube.  I freely and openly acknowledged that I was not aware that it was ON my own youtube.  Why did you not post THAT reference?  Because that was my own reference when I challenged you to deny this.  And my admission - of necessity was only SUBSEQUENT to my earlier statement where I accused you of 'rifling' my photobucket.  Such a glaring omission.  I have never subsequently removed that video link of the demonstration.  And this out of respect to our readers that they can, at least, find the appropriate reference when and IF they read your appalling posts.  Else they won't understand your multiple - excessive - references.  I am, nonetheless, well able to remove that video link should I choose to.  And self-evidently I've chosen NOT to.  And that it's there at all, is because I have often relied on my colleagues to work on my computer through Team Viewer.  This upload was an unfortunate consequence of a misunderstanding.  But I'll live with it - gladly.  I am that old now that I realise that even errors are required to advance certain insights.  And IF this video needed airing - and IF there's a Devine purpose behind our lives - then I suspect that it's served its purpose to show us all how utterly small are your objections and how entirely you need to advance all your 'SPIN'.  Spin has never constituted a scientific argument - any more than inference, implication or 'belief'.  Your emphases are always a salutary reminder.

I'll deal with that specific video in my next post to you.  It's a perfect example of your reliance on all that SPIN rather than on science.

Rosie Pose

added 'to you' because it is not my next post.