Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

TK that wiki entry explains the resurgence of the word "synonymous" in her posts - but her reading is too shallow for her to understand why she's kippering herself quoting it.

Hello again sean.  I see that you're the locum while picowatt's holidaying.  It explains the paucity of your posting numbers.

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Yes, I know. In the drawing the text states that I'm using Watt.

ADDED:
Shit, I forgot the "PER" in my drawing, well here is the PER used in a different setup. :-)

GL.

Hello Groundloop.  Interesting post and really interesting drawing that followed.  I take it that this is with reference to this?

Yep. That and her lack of understanding of the technical use of the word "PER". The woman has no algebra.

Golly.  'With friends like this who needs enemies?'... as the saying goes.  And TK my knowledge of algebra is CLEARLY greater than yours.  You're still trying to argue that a small representative sample of voltages in a switch cycle can be representative of watts.  You are STILL PROFOUNDLY WRONG. 

Rosie Pose

[Groundloop]

Hello Groundloop.  Interesting post and really interesting drawing that followed.  I take it that this is with reference to this?
Golly.  'With friends like this who needs enemies?'... as the saying goes.  And TK my knowledge of algebra is CLEARLY greater than yours.  You're still trying to argue that a small representative sample of voltages in a switch cycle can be representative of watts.  You are STILL PROFOUNDLY WRONG. 

Rosie Pose

Rosemary,

Trying to be funny about my misunderstanding of the "PER". :-)
(Not all people understand my dry humor.)

Any comments to my BIAS current testing?

GL.

[MileHigh]

You're still trying to argue that a small representative sample of voltages in a switch cycle can be representative of watts.  You are STILL PROFOUNDLY WRONG.

This is tedious nonsense.  TK doesn't disagree with the point you are trying to get across.  So please stop this right now.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Do you know that RA has frequently accused me of faking things in my videos?
I laugh and laugh and laugh.

It IS laughable.  You do well to laugh there TK.  And laugh and laugh and laugh - as you put it.  It is my opinion that you are trying very hard to make fools of us all with your videos.  They're a parody of science.  And, indeed a parody of any kind of filming effort.  In fact, it is my opinion that they're the most absurd piece of visual misrepresentation that has ever been managed by anyone at all on the entire internet with the added qualification that this is determined within the  limited scope of my knowledge of all those videos.  They are a priceless sample of 'how not do do things'.  And yet they are hugely diverting - in every sense of the word.

Rosie Pose