Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Tar Baby is in good health:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WHzVGHadcE

Tar Baby and the Capacitors from Beyond:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-Awd8_Xro0

[picowatt]

@picowatt:
It might not be possible to add the internal protection diodes to the F43's output stage as simply as you have suggested, because of this very handy feature of the F43 function generator:

TK,

That switch is not a problem re adding the diodes.  Draw your basic opamp triangle (output to the right) and a horizontal line/rail above and below.  Draw your output line.  Add a reverse connected diode from plus rail to out and from minus rail to out.  That's the basic idea.  The chassis lift switch won't be involved, and yes, nice switch to have...

Quick question(s).  Who is this H.G. that RA thinks I am?  Did I grab an old user handle when I signed up?  Was "picowatt" being used by someone else prior to me?

PW

[TinselKoala]

TK,

That switch is not a problem re adding the diodes.  Draw your basic opamp triangle (output to the right) and a horizontal line/rail above and below.  Draw your output line.  Add a reverse connected diode from plus rail to out and from minus rail to out.  That's the basic idea.  The chassis lift switch won't be involved, and yes, nice switch to have...

Quick question(s).  Who is this H.G. that RA thinks I am?  Did I grab an old user handle when I signed up?  Was "picowatt" being used by someone else prior to me?

PW

I am going to have to look at the schematic. I think the combination of a floatable negative and the offset function might complicate things, although I know what you mean with the simple opamp analogy.

Her accusation of you being HG is another of her delusions. I think he was one of her principle early collaborators, along with FuzzyTomCat, during that stage of the work, beginning I think in 2009. He's a bright fellow. Why she would try to make that connection is simply this: she cannot come to grips with the fact that so many people -- all unrelated and at different times -- have been telling her the same thing about her circuit and her claims... so you see, they must all be the same person, or at least under the control of the same person who is "pulling the strings" of the conspiracy to suppress her earthshaking work. She thinks I am humbugger/cheeseburger, you are Harvey, and who knows who else is who else, simply because we have all told her more or less the same things about her circuit and her mismeasurements.

[picowatt]

I am going to have to look at the schematic. I think the combination of a floatable negative and the offset function might complicate things, although I know what you mean with the simple opamp analogy.

Her accusation of you being HG is another of her delusions. I think he was one of her principle early collaborators, along with FuzzyTomCat, during that stage of the work, beginning I think in 2009. He's a bright fellow. Why she would try to make that connection is simply this: she cannot come to grips with the fact that so many people -- all unrelated and at different times -- have been telling her the same thing about her circuit and her claims... so you see, they must all be the same person, or at least under the control of the same person who is "pulling the strings" of the conspiracy to suppress her earthshaking work. She thinks I am humbugger/cheeseburger, you are Harvey, and who knows who else is who else, simply because we have all told her more or less the same things about her circuit and her mismeasurements.

TK,

As lonk as the available offset swing is less than or equal to the output amp rails, there is no problem.  By the way, that's a floating common, unless the output supply is uniploar.

I see RA is still claiming a COP=infinity.  What the heck does that mean?  I can see where the term is being "slanged up" from its normal usage with heat pumps, but is this really meant to imply that for any amount of work input to the system one can extract an infinite amount of work (or heat)?  Has she ever explained what COP=infinity actually means as she uses it?

Maybe your cap video has processed by now...

PW

[TinselKoala]

"floating common"
Yes, you are right, sloppy language on my part. It's a bipolar output, certainly.

I think her daffynition of "COP Infinity" or even "exceeds infinity" as she sometimes has claimed, is her reference to her belief that the batteries do not discharge at all, so all output is "free" with respect to the nonexistent input from the battery. Anything divided by zero is "infinity" according to the math-challenged. Actually of course division by zero is undefined.
How this is to be reconciled with her untested "thesis" that the circuit material is somehow being converted to usable power is another shady area.

Of course, her entire set of claims is based on two things: first, the negative mean power product, and second, her belief that the batteries, in some of the single tests that she's described, have had their total capacity exceeded by the energy required in those single tests.
The first is of course not evidence of overunity at all, as we have been showing here for months, and the second is a clear result of her mathematical and conceptual incompetence, as has also been shown amply for years now. In other words, she has based her overunity conclusions on the results of math errors, repeated over and over again, and conceptual muddling of the concepts of power and energy.