Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

@Picowatt:
You know, the schematic in the JNP "publication" of the second daft manuscript gives Ainslie the perfect "out" explanation for the scopeshots.   

Since that schematic shows the mosfets whose gates are connected to the RED + FG lead as the Q2x4 gang of four....  she has the perfect explanation for why there  is no current flowing when they are getting a +12 volt signal from the FG.

The 4 gates are in parallel, so each one is only getting 1/4 of the +12 volt voltage signal from the FG RED + lead .... three volts. And any fool knows a mosfet won't turn on with only three volts to the gate.

[picowatt]

@Picowatt:
You know, the schematic in the JNP "publication" of the second daft manuscript gives Ainslie the perfect "out" explanation for the scopeshots.   

Since that schematic shows the mosfets whose gates are connected to the RED + FG lead as the Q2x4 gang of four....  she has the perfect explanation for why there  is no current flowing when they are getting a +12 volt signal from the FG.

The 4 gates are in parallel, so each one is only getting 1/4 of the +12 volt voltage signal from the FG RED + lead .... three volts. And any fool knows a mosfet won't turn on with only three volts to the gate.

Stop baiting... She is already more than confused...


Again, I suggest she find an individual qualified in electronics to assist with her tests.

It is not reasonable to expect that someone with her limited understanding will be able to implement .99's suggestion regarding the use of caps wthout understanding the properties of various types of caps and the need for very short connections between the CSR and the negative most battery terminal (as well as the cap leads).  Even a 4" length of 12 gauge wire is 1.4 ohms at 2.5MHz.

The best non-indcutive resistor I can find for the CSR (with inductance data provided) would be a Caddock TO-3P unit.  Inductance is specified as 10nHy if connections are .2" from the package.  Even this represents a significant error (.157 ohms) at 2.5MHz.

I would suggest soldering the CSR immediately to and at a wire clamped to the negative most battery terminal.  Also, I would suggest increasing the CSR value to as much as 1 ohm to reduce the % of error from lead inductance.


She really needs to find a qualified individual to assist in making/documenting accurate measurements and to ensure safety.

[poynt99]

TK,

I don't think I can help any further with explanations, as it seems the more I explain, the less that is understood.

I think it best I watch as the test results come in, and hopefully I'll have time to do my own demonstration.

[picowatt]

TK,

I don't think I can help any further with explanations, as it seems the more I explain, the less that is understood.

I think it best I watch as the test results come in, and hopefully I'll have time to do my own demonstration.

.99,

I applaud your efforts, and your patience...

It was, however, like watching someone try to describe colors to a blind man...

PW

[TinselKoala]

@.99
I told you. She hasn't learned a thing from you. She has only been pretending, leading you on. If you gave her a 'quiz' today on everything you've covered so far... she'd flunk miserably, and not even acknowledge it, because it's actually YOU that are wrong, you see.

Not only does she know everything there is to know about mosfets, but now, after a day or two of gargling (google garbling), she now knows all about capacitors too.

As I've said before, ignorance is excusable.... barely, in today's internet environment.

But this thing that Ainslie has is not just ignorance. What dynamic makes her come out of the blue and make statements full of error, mendacity and sheer vileness as that last post about my running TB on caps, when people are actually trying to help her understand? What makes her think that 800 microFarads is an eighth of a Farad, and to trumpet this idiotic "fact" as if it was some great revelation from on high? What makes her garble EVERY SINGLE BIT of information she gets and has to repeat? It's a lot more than mere ignorance. There is an active force inside her, deliberately and aggressively screwing up her mentation. Why doesn't she even bother to check her facts? How can she continuously commit such outrageous math errors as to think that 800 microFarads is anywhere near an "eighth of a Farad" and compare it in the same sentence with the 300,000 micro Farad bank that I used to run TB without any batteries at all? I mean...OK, she doesn't understand powers of ten and the common abbreviations like milli, micro, nano, pico. But doesn't the woman have a frigging CALCULATOR WITH BIG BUTTONS ?

This thing she has about capacitors and current really bugs me. How is it possible for someone to pretend to write "papers" on electronics and electricity.... replacing them with zipons ... and yet get material facts so stupidly wrong? This is the Ainslie Phenomenon, a mindworm that crawls through her deluded, half-in-the-bag brain, eating real facts and replacing them with garbled garbage that doesn't even hang together internally... and that, for some reason, she MUST spew forth like so much vomitus and bile.

What testing is this that .99 mentions, though? There will be no testing. She has already demonstrated that she will do ANYTHING... even including sending her apparatus off to strangers..... heh heh , however strange they might be.... to avoid performing any tests. And now that she's driven .99 off with her ignorant mendacity and failure to do her homework.... she gets to play all by herself in her little sandbox and do whatever she likes, interpret what she sees to confirm her "thesis" and continue to lie about her work. She's not going to be doing TESTS at all. She will be trying to do, if anything at all, demonstrations of colored wiggly lines on her Etch-a-Sketch toy oscilloscope. Wiggly lines that are there just for show because she knows the real information is in those little boxes with numbers in them. Numbers she cannot even read correctly..... constantly confusing "milli" with "micro", or thinking that "AC coupling" is appropriate to measure the low-voltage, fluctuating DC gate drive signal.

I just wish she would get on with the comedy show and actually POST THOSE VIDEOS she has been promising us for months now. None of us are getting any younger.