Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

My you are easy to please. So am I really.

Just to see her correct her constant math errors like this recent one where she thinks that 800 microFarads are 0.8 Farad...... that would make me happy. Of course correcting all her math errors would also require her to correct the conclusions that she draws from her erroneous results, like all that spouted insulting nonsense in the screenshot of her forum post.

But she's not going to do that at all. Her very deliberate strategy is to put off doing any testing at all until her detractors, like me, get so disgusted that we give up and go away... so she can start her nonsense all over with a new group of hopeful idiots, hopefully not containing anyone like you, me, Mile High, .99, Glen, Ashtweth, Aaron, Harvey, Windisch and a score of others who realise what she is.

How long ago did she agree to repeat testing on her apparatus? Over a year ago, I think. And how many delays and excuses and insults have we heard? So many I've lost count of them ... which is just what she hopes for.

[poynt99]

Looks like there will be no videos any time soon.

[fuzzytomcat]

Looks like there will be no videos any time soon.

Yep I saw that ..... ODD 

[TinselKoala]

I TOLD YOU SO.

LONG AGO.


The liar has discovered that she cannot support her contentions and her insulting criticisms of what we have been telling her all along. So she will bury the whole thing, until she's got another carefully selected audience of sycophants with little or no critical thinking ability and the lack of knowledge that she depends upon. And she will brook no criticism, no dissent.

She has not been able to disprove or refute ONE SINGLE CONTENTION we have made here on this forum thread, in spite of all her promises and lies and insults and threats. Not one. And yet she continues to make ridiculous assertions of her own that are easy to refute... like mistaking an 800 microFarad motor cap for something like a "one eighth of a Farad" or 0.8 Farad, and insulting me for showing my GENUINE 0.35 Farad capacitor bank.

And on top of this she continues with her paranoid delusions and hallucinations that we are somehow engaged in an operation to rifle her computer and otherwise prevent her from PROVING HER CLAIMS BY DOING PROPER TESTING.

But we know what is really preventing her from testing her claims, don't we.

It is my Tesla Longitudinal Scalar Linecaster, set at frequencies to prevent her and her "team" from ever being able to do any testing. I still have it running in the corner, and it clearly works.... and there is better evidence that it does work, than any evidence of anything that Ainslie has ever presented.... other than the continuing evidence of her abysmal ignorance and overweening arrogance.


@Little Miss Mosfet aka Polly Parrot:  You had better pull your daft "manuscripts" too, Ainslie, because as long as THEY are in public view, people will be wondering the same things that poor Stella Nokia is wondering about-- the errors, inconsistencies, 5 different schematics, FG lead misplaced, the data fudged and selected and omitted and hidden and simply fabricated from whole cloth, the blown mosfets, the bad math and irresponsible claims and irreproducible scopeshots contained in the manuscripts.

Yes Ainslie... by taking the course that you are now taking you are ADMITTING your fraud and that you CANNOT refute anything that's been said about you and your tinkering in this forum.


http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=679    see the comments section

[picowatt]

Looks like there will be no videos any time soon.

Nor does it look like there will be any scientific and/or ethical responses to issues raised regarding her "papers", such as  Q1 not turning on when it should in FIG3, 6, and 7.

Until something as simple and obvious as Q1 not turning on when it should is acknowledged and dealt with via corrections and/or retractions, she will not have much credibility with the "universities or recognized laboratories" she wishes to demo to in the future (or anyone able to read a schematic and a 'scope for that matter).

She damages and causes dismissal of her own work with her denials.  The longer she waits to address even the very obvious Q1 issue, the more damage she does to her own credibility and reputation.  How many of the "universities or recognized laboratories" that she might wish to demo to in the future does she actually believe will be unable to read a schematic and an oscilloscope capture?

What happened to the "well funded laboratory" that not long ago she was so very excited about and sent her circuit off to?  Did she even bother to ask them for an opinion regarding the Q1 issue?  Has she bothered to do any due diligence at all to confirm what is obvious to most everyone but her regarding Q1?  Apparently, she believes even LeCroy is incapable of reading captures from their own oscilloscopes.   

As for doing any further tests with increased precision, she readily demonstrates that she does not have the electronic skills necessary to do so.  I again suggest that she find someone qualified in electronics to assist in performing and documenting any future tests, and correcting her existing papers.