Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 63 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

@mark E no.the nernst equation simply relates voltage to concentration or more precisely,activity of all participating species in an electrode half-reaction.it says nothing about reversability,the kelvin statement is all about reversability.the kelvin statement implies that every time you go through a thermodynamic cycle that you must put effort in the system to repeat it.there is no net change in a karpen cell over time that correlates in any way with the energy it gives because it doesnt need to abide by kelvin statement to fulfill its thermodynamic entropy requirements. 

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on February 11, 2014, 10:56:15 AM
@sarkeizen so you want me to CITE and EXPLAIN in order to FORCE spontaneously reversable thermodynamics in a concentration cell that dont change over time correct?
Your statement is too ambiguous.  Your argument needs to be a series of statements which force a conclusion (Therefore textbooks necessitate the existence of and ability to build a battery which can run an ipod like device constantly and eternally.).  To force, in this case means demonstrate there exists no logically-valid alternative.

Quote from: MarkE on February 11, 2014, 10:30:27 AM
Stepping in here for a moment, my understanding of the Nernst equation is that entropy is implicit within it.
If so, that kind of illustrates my much earlier comment about profitis being a little ignorant about how physical formulae are developed.  Physical formulae are empirical truths, so if we use a regression analysis (or some other tool) to create a formula to relate property X and Y.  We include all the assumptions involved in observing property X and Y.  This creates limitations on inference.  Occasionally math does reveal things that we didn't observe.  The Dirac equation, for example predicted positrons.  However this is not necessarily the general case.

profitis

yes demonstrate is the key word @sarkeizen i.e. to build and see however textbooks will have to do because you are there and i am here so again,do you want me to CITE and EXPLAIN (your not an electrochemist i presume) how a concentration cell,s entropy requirements can be met without kelvin rule in the picture,yes or no. 

profitis

@sarkeizen your implying that kelvin statement is necessary for all thermodynamic entropy requirements is totaly false.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on February 11, 2014, 11:13:14 AM
@mark E no.the nernst equation simply relates voltage to concentration or more precisely,activity of all participating species in an electrode half-reaction.it says nothing about reversability,the kelvin statement is all about reversability.the kelvin statement implies that every time you go through a thermodynamic cycle that you must put effort in the system to repeat it.there is no net change in a karpen cell over time that correlates in any way with the energy it gives because it doesnt need to abide by kelvin statement to fulfill its thermodynamic entropy requirements.
Thanks, but if I let two half cells communicate that have different concentrations of the same ions, my understanding is that they will each move towards the equilibrium concentration.  If they were thermodynamically reversible they might move towards or away from the equilibrium concentration.  Do I understand that incorrectly?