quentron.com

[profitis]

yes indeed sarkeizen.spontaneous entropy reduction in a closed system.i used the word 'concentrate'to help non-scientists on the forum understand.thers a growing number of physicists,scientists out there questioning the validity of 2LOT.i welcome debates with skeptics because it re-enforces my own convictions.if phils device works all future debates about the 2nd law will be settled in one stroke if the power output is big enough 

[sarkeizen]

yes indeed sarkeizen.spontaneous entropy reduction in a closed system

Please explain the mechanism.

i used the word 'concentrate'to

explain something poorly?

thers a growing number of physicists,scientists out there questioning the validity of 2LOT.

Which, you realize is the metric of morons right?

[profitis]

@sarkeizen.only a moron would complain about the word 'concentrate'.please explain why the word 'concentrate' offends you before i explain the tinfoil experiment.

[tagor]

before i explain the tinfoil experiment.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/07/first-results-from-the-box-investigating-the-effects-of-infrared-sky-radiation-on-air-temperature/

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen.only a moron would complain about the word 'concentrate'.please explain why the word 'concentrate' offends you before i explain the tinfoil experiment.

In other words you have no clue.  Thanks for playing.

"concentrate" doesn't offend it is simply not precise enough.  At various points in time a closed system could be said to have "concentrations" of heat but still have the same overall entropy.  This seems pretty obvious, since it's the way most Maxwell Demons (attempt to) work.