quentron.com

[profitis]

@sarkeizen yawn my argument already moved forward long ago and concluded successfully on nature,s terms when i said to you to build it and bear witness to it.its you dragging on behind with citations paraphanalia while im 3 steps ahead into practical application already so its you looking pretty bad right now not me.theres no proofs better than replicability in any frei-energie courtroom threads so nature wins hands down.if you want to be defence attorney for the 2nd law you should be prepared for thread courtrooms and be able to pinpoint exactly how the exhibit runs out of juice,given the fullblown internal layout of the exhibit ontop of it.you havent and you wont.this does dramatic damage to your reputation here as you provide no deadly counter-argument  thus there is no argument,just a discussion going on with mediocre 2star entertainment value.its not even a discussion when the guy says the words,'build it' and 'check it with the schoolbooks' in the same sentence,its a lesson.

[sarkeizen]

yawn

Your promise, multiple times over was to cite a textbook, in fact your whole thesis is "the textbooks say/predict...". Your words to this effect have been quoted by me countless times.  Technically speaking you haven't even made an argument to be refuted but please don't stop avoiding your argument on my account. Keep on demonstrating your trollishness and lack of concern about progressing to your stated point. I've got plenty of time before I reach "hero".

[profitis]

@sarkeizen ho-hum now youre a even more lousy attorney for the 2nd law  than you were a minute ago.i said to use the textbook to help you build a perpetual motion device and you still demand yet another citation :-)

[Madebymonkeys]

Hi Profitis,

How about you just quote a few textbooks or demonstrate your own practical experience of the everlasting power source?
If its so incredibly easy and well documented, it should be a piece of p&ss to replicate - lots of people here would love to know how.

Better still, make one (from the textbooks which show you how) and I will give you a £5000 if you can demonstrate it powering something common like an iPod for, say, a week running video constantly (there are caveats of course, I can explain if you are serious about the prize).

You know what, if its well documented (which you haven't proven thus far - correct me if I am wrong of course (by citing a peer-reviewed publication)) then I doubt it works - the amount of people looking for a 'perpetual' battery are in the millions and the chances of them missing an 'all textbooks' instruction-guide are slim.

Again, I would love to see this working but I cannot find any textbook or online source showing how!
Can you?

I am not siding with either of you in this argument (I am happy to sit on the fence and watch - as are a lot of people....it's entertaining!!!!) but I have to admit that Sarkeizen has a point - you aren't providing what you said was readily available and you aren't providing any practical proof. Instead, you are forcing Sarkeizen to disprove you when you haven't actually proven anything...pretty lame.

Why not put your theory where your mouth is and show us all how to do it or at least provide that fu:;ing cite - I cannot find it and I have tried, throw this dog a bone won't ya!

Thanks!

[sarkeizen]

ho-hum

So far no textbook cites.  Your promise, multiple times over was to cite a textbook, in fact your whole thesis was "the textbooks say/predict you can make a battery which will run and ipod like device forever".  As demonstrated earlier it's pretty doubtful that textbooks say any such thing.  Without a textbook cite, you don't have an argument to refute.  Which I suppose helps you keep your self-esteem since there is no argument to destroy as long as you keep hiding it. So I guess I can understand that.

Keep on trolling, EOA don't let thinking people lure you out into the open.  Keep on hiding.