quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

A)yes

Are you saying you spent an eternal amount of time observing the device prior to me posing the question?

B)whoooar! Are you saying that the class of cells discussed here fall more in line with information theory than the proposed quenco?

No idea, as you have provided only one cite which I haven't read yet and no useful explanation of the mechanism.  However if it's a MD device then information theory says you're probably wrong.

yeah but the phonecall costed you

No.  Again the person who made this hard is simply and entirely you asshole.

[profitis]

A)yeah B)wtf man.just when i thought this shit was about to get intresting you trip me up again.i dont give a fuck what info theory says,thank god for reproducability thats all im saying.C)bullshit.im glad i stalled your ass coz now i,l just refer you and everyone else to the WIKIPEDIA OXYGEN CONCENTRATION CELL namsayn.WIKIPEDIA O2 CELL @sarkeizen.i dare you to build and test one,even theoretically.

[sarkeizen]

A)yeah

So you're lying.  Again.

wtf man.just when i thought this shit was about to get intresting

You have made pretty sure that won't happen.

you trip me up again.i dont give a fuck what info theory says,thank god for reproducability thats all im saying.

Well if it's against information theory then you (and possibly others ) are probably wrong...repeatedly.  Also given that you've lied many times in this thread it's not like your claim of a violation or being reproducible is really worth much.

bullshit.im glad i stalled your ass

So in other words you just admitted that you're an EOA.  Congratulations, I guess?

i dare you to build and test one,even theoretically.

Sorry, daring someone to be stupid isn't really very enticing but it probably works with the local yokels.

[profitis]

@sarkeizen..A)nope B)thats what im trying to say to you man.info theory is your shit so you should be able to tell us if a wikipedia-cell and a kelvin-bust will be compatible with it in some way.work it out man.i got a feeling they are.C) oh k mr smartass in other words youre saying that its stupid to build a wikipedia-cell? Lay that one by me again man??rotfl!

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen..A)nope

Except that you just stated you spent an eternal amount of time in a finite period.  That is a lie.  sorry.

B)thats what im trying to say to you man.info theory is your shit so you should be able to tell us if a wikipedia-cell

What I said was: You have provided only one cite which I haven't read yet and no useful explanation of the mechanism involved.  It would be stupid to claim something is a violation of any theory if the thing in question has been poorly explained and supported.

youre saying that its stupid to build a wikipedia-cell?

If the objective is to validate that such a cell would run eternally then yeah that would be exceptionally stupid to build one for that purpose.  Anyone who's read Karl Popper could have told you that.  It's such a well-known problem in science there's actually a formal name for it.