quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen..are you aware that we

rofl...aren't we plural today...moron.

Are you aware that we want to cut through the crap and see some evidence?

Evidence for what thesis of mine?  That textbooks DON'T necessarily predict a battery which runs eternally?  How could building anything provide evidence for or against the main thing I've been talking about for three months?  Especially when YOU YOURSELF said I didn't need to observe anything (and by extension didn't need to build anything).  YOU said I just needed to read textbooks.  Right?  You said that right?  I can quote you again if you like.

You know if you want to have another different discussion...it might just be easier if you concede this point.  Considering your desperate change of subject I think we all know, that you know that you lost.

Just 'sayin.

[profitis]

mr sarkeizen..thesis sir? Are you saying you will not be able to demonstrate kelvins law within the wikipedia battery in question?that you rather prefer to chat about it?

[sarkeizen]

mr sarkeizen..thesis sir?

The only thesis we are discussing, as far as I know.  Is that you told me that textbooks clearly necessitate a battery which runs forever.  You said, that nothing needs to be built to demonstrate this.  Again, I can quote where you said or otherwise expressed these ideas.

Were you lying then? Or have you changed your mind and you no longer believe that textbooks alone are sufficient to prove your point?

[profitis]

mr sarkeizen..ok sir.you prefer to chat about it then.no problemo.

[sarkeizen]

mr sarkeizen..ok sir.you prefer to chat about it then.no problemo.

Chat about what?  The one thesis that has dominated this "discussion"?  What do you think we've been doing?  What would you rather do?  Demonstrate it?  Sure, that was exactly what you spent three months trying to avoid apparently because you're some kind of enormous obstructionist asshole.

Perhaps you need to figure out what you're saying before you say it.  Moron.