quentron.com

[profitis]

@sarkeizen..A)no im hitting you  B)my argument is completely formal and totaly logic.textbooks necessitate the existence of the wikipedia oxygen concentration cell..

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen..A)no im hitting you

Well it feels like you're tickling so you can understand my confusion.

B)my argument is completely formal and totaly logic.

Wrong.  Please recite the requirements of a formal logical argument and explain why your argument meets them.  You can't because you simply don't know.

[profitis]

@sarkeizen:A)well i knew you must be taking drugs because B)my argument is totaly logical and formal: textbooks abso-f*****g-lutely necessitate the wikipedia type gas concentration cell..please point out where it is illogical and informal.

[sarkeizen]

)my argument is totaly logical and formal

Please explain how what you are presenting is a formal logical argument.

[profitis]

answer for sarkeizen:first of all let let me be absolutely clear about what im arguing.textbooks. necessitate.the.existence.of.wikipedia-type electrochemical cells.that means textbooks(e.g.college textbooks)can be used to predict and sustain evidence for the existence of electrochemical cells related to electrochemical cells mentioned in wikipedia. Please point out where you are lost here..