Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Fernando`s Force multiplier

Started by neptune, May 03, 2012, 03:09:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

bugler

Power = torque * angular velocity.


The patent above is absurd and completely obvious as the concept is used in every day machines.


Do you need more torque? Just slow the turning speed and you have it ... but the power remains the same (actually a little less thanks to mechanical losses).




lancaIV

@bugler: this inventor,Hanna Albert Awad,publicated during several years different energy concepts and ideas.
                  In some of his patent/utility publications he wrote about prototype construction and testing.

                 Probably he built such a 3step-gear-converter and did the tests or he did not.
                 
And do not forget: we are thinking about over-unity systems and not less !
                 
Sincerely
                 CdL
                 
                 
                 
     

bugler

I was talking about the patent in the message inmediatellyabove mine.


i_ron

Hi All,


Here is the first run of my replication, no load, slow speed...


[/font][/size]http://youtu.be/lbUIyI1ufIQ[/color][/font]


Ron






TinselKoala

Nice workshop, I'm jealous. I especially like the meter shelf, and the clips to hold the bags in the wastebaskets.
Is that a real Kennedy tool chest, or one of the cheap Harbor Freight knockoffs? (I have one of each; the Kennedy is nicer of course, as it ought to be, at four times the price.)

With the setup you've got it will be easy to do comparison testing. You can simply remove your connecting rod and short crankthrows from the backside and put 1-to-1 pulleys and a connecting belt between the wheels (brake disks?) on the front side, and then compare outputs of that simple control system, to the outputs of the full, con-rod connected system.

ETA: Are the short crankthrows the same length (radius, arm, whatever you want to call it) on both wheels? If they are the same, then a 1-1 pulley arrangement might be a good comparison test. If they are different, this makes the action different than a belt-and-pulley arrangement, because even though the speeds are different the wheels will still make 1-1 rotations, whereas with a belt and different sized pulleys they won't.