Simple to build isolation transformer that consumes less power than it gives out

[Ghazanfar_Ali]

Just an idea of mine. Need Comments.

[T-1000]

Hi guys,

Over time I studded what factors could lead such circuit into OU (+second energy source from background) conditions.

What I see related to Jack Noskills stuff are conditions when you have resonance in paralel and resonance in series mixing together on same circuit. Please see my posts with more explanation on it if interested in cross-over thread starting at my post http://www.overunity.com/12736/kapanadze-cousin-dally-free-energy/msg357338/#msg357338

Cheers!

[bryanwizard]

if you experiment the above schematic it will only give you half of the output.

please see it first that you understand basic electronics before posting such stuff.

[dieter]

This is how it ends? What a shame. I think Jack said the truth. But some of you look-at-me-I-know-everything-betters are just unbearable.


Jack, I still think there was some special phenomena going on. Selfinductence, causing opposite energy flow, not only in the primary, but also in the secondary coil, as far as I see.
But since the secondary in connected with Transformer 2, it has a double saturation time. But not only that, Tr 2 is also shortened, so L1 magneticly induces into L2, while L2 induces in L1, with a small delay, probably causing a standing wave.
Tr2 also has the high selfinductense, which makes the whole thing even harder to understand. As far as I see, your phenomen results from the natural resonance of the 1:1 Ts, their harmonies and a slight detuning due to cable lengts etc. that will allow the quasi standing wave to be partially extracted.


Probably this is OU, probably just theft from the power plant since you maybe use their voltage without to actually let current flow, it is however remarkable and I hope you continued with it. Wish you good luck.
I have to say, I'm a beginner in electronics, so my mind is not yet blocked by the dogmata of "accepted science ".   


Took me quite some time to read the whole thread.

[MarkE]

Dieter, this sort of thing has come up before and when carefully evaluated there was never any OU.  The usual problem is confusing real power:  That is power that actually does useful work with reactive power, which is power that gets stored and released.  One can catch and release a thousand fish a day, but they can't cook any they don't keep for dinner.  So it is with reactive power:  It is stored and then released back to the source.  Any fish that we "keep" represent real power.

Low cost power monitoring devices do a poor job of separating out real power from reactive power.  Things with big coils and / or big capacitors confuse such devices.  A self-looping test would be definitive.  If a self-looped test cannot be arranged then the power measurements have to be performed carefully with something like a power analyzer.