FDM - flux displacer motor by Igor Knitel (Perihelion Labs)

[wizkycho]

Hi all !

this is where I left off in field of PM Only motors, and this is where I really "felt the force"
http://www.overunity.com/316/rotational-pmm-by-wizkycho/msg151552/#msg151552
but realized - it is repulsion type device and eventually it is prone to weaken or even lose magnetic field of PMs. (so not practical)

Now I present you pure attractional type device with really great properties:

- capable of COP 15 or higher
  (i used 4 segments if used more COP increases proportionaly)
- Input Rotor needs mechanicall energy only to overcome friction
  (regardless of number of segments and regardless of how heavy load is on Output Rotor)
  In return IR creates four (in my setup) fluctuating (0.03T to 0.8T) and rotating magnetic fields
  that are strongly attracting (repositioning) permeable material on Output Rotor
- whatever is happening with Output Rotor -> Input Rotor is not influenced, not even a bit. -> Load is not transfered to Input Rotor whatsoever

The simplicity, energy gain, ammount of energy at output and longevity is just wonderfull
think of it - this is very powerfull device and most powerfull of devices that we currently have blueprints and understanding of how to build it.
           I came up with this idea after many experiments conducted by mr. Hildebrand, Genesis and many members of OU.com , me included.
            http://www.overunity.com/1319/magnetic-energy-pump-ou-motor/msg164396/#msg164396

                                                Congrats to mr. Calloway on his working V-Track motor (http://www.youtube.com./watch?v=oJv58SXx2V8)

[wizkycho]

@Harti
greetings
FDM_v1_anim_mid.gif is static it should be animation ?

[wizkycho]

Hi all !
i'm bit dissapointed
that You all have been unable to see that my device (FDM) is the best way to achieve overunity.
is there OU device with more powerfull output or higher gain then FDM and with complete blueprints ? please do enlighten me !
Recent topics are just chasing milliwats or mere fog with hazy incomplete data.
please, just prove my following claims wrong !:
- capable of COP 15 or higher
  (i used 4 segments if used more COP increases proportionaly)
- Input Rotor needs mechanicall energy only to overcome friction
  (regardless of number of segments and regardless of how heavy load is on Output Rotor)
  In return IR creates four (in my setup) fluctuating (0.03T to 0.8T) and rotating magnetic fields
  that are strongly attracting (repositioning) permeable material on Output Rotor
- whatever is happening with Output Rotor -> Input Rotor is not influenced, not even a bit. -> Load is not transfered to Input Rotor whatsoever
Thanks
Igor Knitel

[broli]

This might not work as you expect it to. You might look in all the lafonte research to see why. And don't highjack other threads, it's kind of rude.

[wizkycho]

@broli
  Exactly why do You think FDM would not work
please be exact, where do You think is an error.
  ^{I'm only stating my well educated opinion, based on exact experiments
and this is not Your call to shush me. Or Big Money got You Too...
such a pitty if so cause You had brilliant and applicapable Lorentz force ideas...}

Free Energy and Overunity lives forewer
We shall never surender
Perihelion Labs
CEO Igor Knitel

now lets talk about OIL disasters, Green House effect., draughts,  and possible annihilation of animal and possibly human species
and a Cure for all that tremendous stupidity (hope that Einstain was not right bout one thing - that stupidity is most powerfull force in universe):
We must allways prove him wrong about that thing over and over again PERPETUALY.

so where do you think FDM is not working as stated ?

All the best

Igor Knitel