Probality of God

[ramset]

Wanna hear a really Big story .....,really Cute and fuzzy??

It starts with a Big BANG..............

And some Magic Soup and some Magic conditions in a really magical fantastical place.

We can keep going back and forth with these "Fairy Tales"........

One thing I do Know ...there are a few Men here that bust there Ass for the rest of us
and  """share""" all their hard work ..no strings attached, they are really trying to make this world a better place and prove it by their actions .

You will know them by their works..........

Thx
Chet

The people that would keep us in the chains probably Love this kind of crap we do here
I'm gettin back to work ...on my Fantastical Fairytale OU thingy.......
Later.

[sparks]

  There was a real Santa Claus.  He would put badly needed clothes and food in a sleigh and bring it to various families in need in the beginning of winter in a scandanavian country.   There was a real Santa Claus he was a mean prick that made his feudal slaves work his fields and factories.  He would show up once a year and distribute needed supplies to keep his slaves alive until spring when they would start working his town for them.  There was a real Santa Claus he was a VP of Goldman Sachs.  He made anybody who payed their phone bill to donate gold to fill his sleigh full of cell phones.  He then gave the cellphones and 80minutes free use to poor people.  There was a real Santa Claus .....

[Newton II]

No it didnt!

Your statement is nonfactual and disappointing. If you are going to make statements about science make sure you research your statement before you make it.

It has been proven many times over eye witnesses are very unreliable. Even when there is more than one. When it comes to claims of the supernatural, group hysteria is not uncommon. I like to call that group hysteria 'Religion'.

If you want to defer to science in your claim of seeing a ghost then you must expect that your statement would be treated with the greatest distrust, only empirical repeatable, quantifiable evidence would be accepted. So far there has not been one empirical test that proves the existence of ghosts.

Of course there are plenty who pray on people who believe in ghosts.

I am not that much of a layman  not to differentiate between mass hysteria  and reality.   Hysteria cannot affect  mentally strong people.    It usually affects girls who are high on feelings hence week in  mind. (not all)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_hysteria


Several  Nobel prize  winner  scientists have attended  séances  and paranormal spots  and taken photographs  of spirits.    You cannot say that they are all hysterical.   


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katie_King_%28spirit%29
               
http://www.mcremo.com/paranormal.html   

You better  do some research work  before making  hysterical  comments

[Gwandau]

  When ghosts are  there,  God also should be there hence I believe in God also.

First of all, possible realms beyond the observable physical world does not need a god to exist.
To back up the probability of god by personal experiences of non physical events is non scientific.

But to engage in research into uncharted areas like possible interference observations caused by so called non physical phenomenon is fully scientifically correct.

It is on the other hand unscientific to limit scientific research to physical events. It contradicts the very idea of a scientific approach to repeated observations.

All you guys who react against anything with the slightest smell of non physical phenomena are not reacting scientically correct.

Anything observable, physical or non physical, are worthy subjects to scientific study.

To dismiss paranormal observations unconditionally as mental illusions are non scientific, and if you demand the methodology of measuring and observing physical events upon a realm that won't be detected by such equipment, you are acting non-scientifically.

The methods for studying and proving so called non physical events self evidently has to be subjected to quite different empirical procedures than the study of physical events.

Remember, mankind has still not found the Higgs particle, a fact which actually makes the world today still non physical in quality.

But again, to you who are believers, a non physical reality does not need a god to exist.

It just need a universe to be as immensely abundant as the very quality of INFINITY indicates.

Gwandau

[WilbyInebriated]

Remember, mankind has still not found the Higgs particle, a fact which actually makes the world today still non physical in quality.

while i agree with most of what you wrote, the above is asinine... the fact that the higgs boson, though predicted, remains undiscovered does not make the world non physical.

the only thing it does is weaken the THEORY of the standard model.