Probality of God

[gravityblock]

Water holds together in zero gravity due to electromagnetic bonding between the water molecules.  This, however, is not what makes us stick to the earth.


And about this sunlight reflected from the moon business, why does the Sun cause less of a tide than the moon?  It is so much brighter, after all.

The water isn't in zero gravity during the experiment.  The electromagnetic bonding between the water molecules at the surface of the earth isn't strong enough to hold the water together, so why would it be strong enough to hold the water together at 90-95% of gravity during the experiment, especially when the tablet is introduced?  You also didn't provide a plausible explanation in why there are no tides in the Great Lakes, etc, when the gravitational-tidal theory predicts there should be.  The repulsive force of light easily explains this.  The pressure of light applied per square mile over the Great Lakes isn't enough to cause a compression at one point to raise it up at another.  I never said the sun caused less of a tide than the moon.  The reflected light from the moon causes a compression at one point, and the direct light from the sun a compression at another.  Thus, it is that the tides are highest at the full moon, these two pressures then being conjoined.

Gravock

[WilbyInebriated]

The water isn't in zero gravity during the experiment.  The electromagnetic bonding between the water molecules at the surface of the earth isn't strong enough to hold the water together, so why would it be strong enough to hold the water together at 90-95% of gravity during the experiment, especially when the tablet is introduced?  You also didn't provide a plausible explanation in why there are no tides in the Great Lakes, etc, when the gravitational-tidal theory predicts there should be.  The repulsive force of light easily explains this.  The pressure of light applied per square mile over the Great Lakes isn't enough to cause a compression at one point to raise it up at another.  I never said the sun caused less of a tide than the moon.  The reflected light from the moon causes a compression at one point, and the direct light from the sun a compression at another.  Thus, it is that the tides are highest at the full moon, these two pressures then being conjoined.

Gravock

why don't these compressions due to light from the sun and the moon affect the great lakes?

[gravityblock]

why don't these compressions due to light from the sun and the moon affect the great lakes?

I already answered that.  Here it is again:

The pressure of light applied per square mile over the Great Lakes isn't enough to cause a compression at one point to raise it up at another.  The Great Lakes don't have enough square miles to receive enough pressure.

Gravock

[WilbyInebriated]

I already answered that.  Here it is again:

The pressure of light applied per square mile over the Great Lakes isn't enough to cause a compression at one point to raise it up at another.  The Great Lakes don't have enough square miles.

Gravock

yeah... your personal fiat declaration doesn't really hold much authority...    do you have any SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to back up your asinine unsubstantiated claim?

[gravityblock]

yeah... your personal fiat declaration doesn't really hold much authority...    do you have any SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to back up your asinine unsubstantiated claim?

Yes, the daily retardation of the tides is caused by the angle of the Sun to the Earth at the time.

Gravock