Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 176 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: lost_bro on April 28, 2016, 11:51:59 AM
A decent choice would be the CREE SiC Schottky diodes.
'Zero reverse current' and essentially zero reverse recovery time (trr).
Which means that such diode cannot take the place of D2.

Jeg

Hi Itsu
I would try a zener instead of tvs at the base. In addition I think a quicker diode would be better than the 1n4148 at base.

lost_bro

Quote from: verpies on April 28, 2016, 01:16:38 PM
Which means that such diode cannot take the place of D2.

Hello Verpies

Yes, I did not think it was D2 that *clamped* the flyback spike on the *FET* (IGBT).  D2 must meet the DSRD criterion ( diode capacitance charging/discharging)  Shouldn't that be D1 (fast recovery diode) which clamps (re-routes) the flyback spike?
How much capacitance would be considered *sufficient* to demonstrate the DSRD effect?  The C4D20120 SiC has Ir=65uA @ Vr =1200V  & 175C and Qctotal=130nC @ Vr=800V.
Has anyone ever tried a SiC diode (as D2) in a DSRD setup just for shits & grins?
Maybe something new to try ;D
take care, peace
lost_bro

itsu

Quote from: Jeg on April 28, 2016, 02:43:16 PM
Hi Itsu
I would try a zener instead of tvs at the base. In addition I think a quicker diode would be better than the 1n4148 at base.


Hi Jeg,

i thought that a tvs would be faster then a regular zener as it is specifically designed for clamping.
Good point for the 1n4148, i could try a bat46 schottky,  thanks.

Itsu

itsu

Quote from: lost_bro on April 28, 2016, 03:13:43 PM
Hello Verpies

Yes, I did not think it was D2 that *clamped* the flyback spike on the *FET* (IGBT).  D2 must meet the DSRD criterion ( diode capacitance charging/discharging)  Shouldn't that be D1 (fast recovery diode) which clamps (re-routes) the flyback spike?
How much capacitance would be considered *sufficient* to demonstrate the DSRD effect?  The C4D20120 SiC has Ir=65uA @ Vr =1200V  & 175C and Qctotal=130nC @ Vr=800V.
Has anyone ever tried a SiC diode (as D2) in a DSRD setup just for shits & grins?
Maybe something new to try ;D
take care, peace
lost_bro

Lost, 

i think the reflected nano-pulse will be "seen" and being taken care of firstly by the D2 (KD226D) diode.
This is a 800V diode, so i could put 2 in series to handle that pulse, not sure what 2 dsrd diodes in series does to the nano-pulse itself.

Itsu