Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[NickZ]

 @ Forest:
     I would if I could...  What older video?

   There is another thing I'd like to add.  It may be very important to have rectified DC, going into the device. As possibly the AC may kill the way it is supposed to work. Just a though, but... you never know.

[NickZ]

  After watching the SR193 video again for about the fifth time, I'm still impressed. Seeing that he only uses 12v, and 1 amp input to charge a 4700 microfarad capacitor to start his system. Then disconnects the input source, and his device runs itself while it also lights a 150watt, 220v bulb.
The only components I see are two transistors, and the start capacitor mentioned. That's it!
  He mentions a ferromagnetic core, which I would assume he may mean some sort of ferrite core (possibly), which is wound with a couple of coils, on top of it. From which the output goes to an regular iron transformer, (not shown). This iron transformer's output is then going to light the bulb, as well as also feeding back to input side (I think).
Any way, I love simple circuits. 
Were there ever any other replications, schematics, diagrams, specs, or further versions from him, or any one else???
  Hard to believe that something like this would just be left behind, forgotten, and left  collecting dust.

[Grumage]

  After watching the SR193 video again for about the fifth time, I'm still impressed. Seeing that he only uses 12v, and 1 amp input to charge a 4700 microfarad capacitor to start his system. Then disconnects the input source, and his device runs itself while it also lights a 150watt, 220v bulb.
The only components I see are two transistors, and the start capacitor mentioned. That's it!
  He mentions a ferromagnetic core, which I would assume he may mean some sort of ferrite core (possibly), which is wound with a couple of coils, on top of it. From which the output goes to an regular iron transformer, (not shown). This iron transformer's output is then going to light the bulb, as well as also feeding back to input side (I think).
Any way, I love simple circuits. 
Were there ever any other replications, schematics, diagrams, specs, or further versions from him, or any one else???
  Hard to believe that something like this would just be left behind, forgotten, and left  collecting dust.

Dear Nick.

Attached below is what is reputed to be the the most accurate and latest SR 193 circuit. As you can see it shares all the common elements of "MO ??" I have also attached what I think was also a credible circuit. But there are only so many hours in a day, and these things can cost a fortune to make!!

I have had yet another disaster with another IGBT and my newly acquired Variac going up in smoke. And then as if that was not enough, one of our Cats jumped onto the bench and knocked down the main coil with all the rest following to the floor!! A stiff drink is in order, methinks

Final attachment is how I think the coil should be connected. Opinions welcomed. But I must add that it was with this configuration, that took out my components!!

Cheers Grum.

[verpies]

Attached below is what is reputed to be the the most accurate and latest SR 193 circuit.

That would almost make sense if there was a Gain Medium (large diameter, thickly walled, thinly slotted pipe composed out of copper or brass or aluminum) positioned between two halves of the ferrite core (where the red color is).
...and the two winding halves supplied by the spark-gap were wound in opposite directions (CCW + CW) in order to create a radial field in the Gain Medium, as in Diag.2a illustrated here.

[Grumage]

That would almost make sense if there was a Gain Medium (large diameter, thickly walled, thinly slotted pipe composed out of copper or brass or aluminum) positioned between two halves of the ferrite core (where the red color is).
...and the two winding halves supplied by the spark-gap were wound in opposite directions (CCW + CW) in order to create a radial field in the Gain Medium, as in Diag.2a illustrated here.

Dear Verpies.

I have been sitting on this diagram for quite a while. It is only now, thanks to you and T-1000 that I finally feel I have a grasp on the MO of these exotic devices!!

But would it not be better to have the standing waves provided by the middle layer? You can see the polarity is right and being wound back on each other you would have two distinct halves. Then the "Shot gun" approach provided by the Spark Gap would excite the gain medium in the usual way.

That is my take on it!!

Cheers Grum.