Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

Using a 220V-12V transformer driven by a variac from mains, i was powering a 12V/21W bulb via the MOSFET shortener
I used the single diode in the drain, so not the FWBR.

That's a good experiment. I don't have much to add to it.  Maybe T-1000 could help you further.

P.S.
A related experiment with a spiked saturated transformer core might be interesting at this point.
The saturation can be accomplished with more primary AC current or an additional winding with DC in it (more convenient).

"spiking" can be done with your shorting scheme or with your nanopulser.

[MenofFather]

Nick ask from vere going center wire on yoke. It can be going from plus 220 volts 100 herc. http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/289/img004_2-2.jpg Like in this schematic.
Capasito 5 uF 600 volts is not nessary must be. Akula in one video say, that he finding capasitor and using that on who voltage is bigest. Then its mean that it work on resonance LC circuit. Let say you use 1 mikrofarad capasitor, then on it voltage you check with metter is 40 volts. Then you use 2 mikrofarad, voltage 43 volts, then use 4 mikrofarads, then 60 volts, then 5 mikrofarads, then let say 70 volts, then 8 mikrofarads, then let say 60 volts. That mean that LC resonance is on 5 mikrofarad capasitor and tick wires can makes hot.

[gyulasun]

Hi Itsu,

Many thanks for showing this load test!  I assume if the ON time of the shorting pulse could be much narrower than it was, then the increase of the input power draw would be less?  Also, the fall time of the pulse (when it switches OFF the MOSFET)  determines the amplitude of the spike, so can you see any improvement possibility?

Thanks,  Gyula

Using a 220V-12V transformer driven by a variac from mains, i was powering a 12V/21W bulb via the MOSFET shortener
I used the single diode in the drain, so not the FWBR.

One probe was across the bulb showing the voltage and the other one was across a 0.1 Ohm resistor in the bulb return lead measuring the current.

We see some increase in light intensity when shortend, but also the input on the variac increases from 22W till 30W.

Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpWrPrwPcWo&feature=youtu.be

Regards Itsu

[verpies]

Many thanks for showing this load test!  Also, the fall time of the pulse (when it switches OFF the MOSFET)  determines the amplitude of the spike, so can you see any improvement possibility?

He could go below 100ns pulse width with his MOSFET DSRD driver (without the associated toroid and the DSR diode, attached).

Also, notice, that Itsu's load is not powered by the spikes only, but it is also powered by the rectified sine wave. 
He could use Zener diodes in series with his load/bulb so that only spikes get through.

I don't think he will want to make these changes, without understanding what they are supposed to accomplish.

[gyulasun]

He could go below 100ns pulse width with his MOSFET DSRD driver (without the associated toroid and the DSR diode, attached).

Also, notice, that Itsu's load is not powered by the spikes only, but it is also powered by the rectified sine wave. 
He could use Zener diodes in series with his load/bulb so that only spikes get through.

I don't think he will want to make these changes, without understanding what they are supposed to accomplish.

Hi Verpies,

I agree,   using MOSFET driver can achieve less than 100ns pulse width, together with even less switch-off time.
Yes, I was aware of his load powered by the rectified secondary sinewave voltage, the Zener diode usage is a good idea to separate the rectified sinewave from the spike of the collapsed field.
For those not getting these things:  the shorter the ON time of the shorting switch i.e. the shorter the pulse width, the less influence will the shorting have on the input power draw.  And the faster the action of the switch-off event, the higher the induced spike amplitude will be. 
I am not suggesting that this process gives extra output over the input, I have not done such tests.

Thanks, Gyula