Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[verpies]

I've seen OU devices with a center tap that changes the wind direction on secondary coils but never on a primary coil.
I'm not saying it's wrong, just that I haven't seen one.

The winding direction does not matter by itself.  It is the relative direction of the current in these windings that is significant, because it determines the direction of the magnetic flux that is produced in the common core (or space).
For primary windings, this current and flux direction is determined by the manner of connections between two windings (or halves), together with their winding directions and polarity of the power supply.

A varying magnetic flux (Φ) externally supplied into the common core, will not result in any voltage appearing across winding terminals connected according to Diag.2a and Diag.2b, therefore these configurations are useless as secondary windings of transformers.

However these configurations (Diag.2a and Diag.2b) can be useful as special primary windings capable of creating a magnetic flux that is perpendicular to their axis between them (e.g. as in NMR).

P.S.
In the diagrams below, the magnetic flux lines represent flux produced by windings operating as primary windings (in other words: windings that are externally supplied with electric current).
Parallel winding connections are not discussed here, but they follow the same principles.

[dllabarre]

I'm done with this thread and all the sneaky dis-info agents and their twisted ways of negating information.
To many dis-info agents just cut-paste text book information that doesn't apply to OU devices.
Then in a twisted way say a poster is a liar even when the posted said "I've seen".
Enough is enough.


Don't bother responding to this post because I won't be here to see your response.
Good-bye
DonL

[verpies]

Too many dis-info agents just cut-paste text book information that doesn't apply to OU devices.

It applies. 
I drew these diagrams myself especially to reply to your post.  Use images.google.com and you'll see that this diagram was posted here first.

The text was not copied from anywhere. I created it, too.

[itsu]

No, but in this file only possible schematic of Akula.
In Dally divice is 10-1 kiloherc from Tl generator and 1-100 kiloherc from nanosecond pulses 700-1000 volts generator. Nanosecond pulses have leng 1-2 nanosecond probarly. I think is about 1-10 kiloherc of this pulses. So duty cycle is very small. Dit Itsu try put pulses of 1-2 nanocecond with voltage 1000-700 volts and with frenquency 1-10 kiloherc?
And how write dally, for ajust his divice (after rewind coils he ajust it) need changing frenquency and duty cycle on his TL generator, so not need ajust nanosecond pulses frenquency and duty cycle.

MenofFather,

my nano-pulser is able to pulse at a pulse repetition frequency of 1Khz  to 15Khz, producing 12 nanosecond wide (so not 1-2) pulses of 800 to 1500V depending on the impedance of the pulsed circuit.

In my Dally replication i swept through that range without finding any abnormalities.

Keep on putting out more of your thoughts.

Regards Itsu   

[T-1000]

It applies. 
I drew these diagrams myself especially to reply to your post.  Use images.google.com and you'll see that this diagram was posted here first.

The text was not copied from anywhere. I created it, too.

The diagrams you just posted show incorrect field vectors where CW and CCW meet. The field vectors like that are only when same pole magnetic orientation meet the gap. The conventional physics book says "it cancels magnetic field" when opposite magnetic polarities meet in middle but obviously the scalar magnetic field reveals itself only from second property of magnets when main magnetic field is canceled. And its vector is not straight line nor running from one pole to another.
I think this is what did upset DonL.