Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 84 Guests are viewing this topic.

itsu

Quote from: Hoppy on February 18, 2016, 06:27:07 AM
Itsu,

Is your 15V regulator getting very warm in comparison to when you are running just on resistive loads without the primary windings connected?

Hoppy,  no, no diffference noticed.


Itsu

Hoppy

Quote from: itsu on February 18, 2016, 07:00:46 AM
Hoppy,  no, no diffference noticed.


Itsu

Hmm, I think we need Verpies on the case!

Dog-One

Quote from: itsu on February 18, 2016, 06:59:48 AM
yes that is what it looks like, but as i tried the Oleg green box snubber setup (similar as yours), it did not change that problem.

Yes, that's why I mentioned the core and the number of turns on the primary.  I have a hunch you are pushing the core just into saturation and it's kicking back overly hard.  I ran into a similar problem when using too few primary turns on a less than optimal core.

The setup I have now will run unloaded on the secondary consuming only about 50mA.  When loaded it drives to about 5 amps by adjusting voltage.  So it has a nice working range and is predictable.  I do have the snubbers which protect the MOSFETs and there is a little bit of ringing with certain loads.  I went through a dozen or so cores and many different winding configurations to finally get it where it is now.  The Sendust cores I started with worked okay for resistive loads on the secondary, but failed miserably with inductive loads.  Using 14.5 turns on each primary with this nanocrystaline core is the most optimal I have found so far.  Still using the same IFRB3077 power MOSFETs.  I also have a 1000uF 50 volt electrolytic capacitor very near each MOSFET acting as a current dump when the MOSFET turns on.  I'm also using very large traces on the PCB with a grounded backplane (bottom foil).

Hoppy

Quote from: Dog-One on February 18, 2016, 07:32:50 AM
Yes, that's why I mentioned the core and the number of turns on the primary.  I have a hunch you are pushing the core just into saturation and it's kicking back overly hard.  I ran into a similar problem when using too few primary turns on a less than optimal core.

The setup I have now will run unloaded on the secondary consuming only about 50mA.  When loaded it drives to about 5 amps by adjusting voltage.  So it has a nice working range and is predictable.  I do have the snubbers which protect the MOSFETs and there is a little bit of ringing with certain loads.  I went through a dozen or so cores and many different winding configurations to finally get it where it is now.  The Sendust cores I started with worked okay for resistive loads on the secondary, but failed miserably with inductive loads.  Using 14.5 turns on each primary with this nanocrystaline core is the most optimal I have found so far.  Still using the same IFRB3077 power MOSFETs.  I also have a 1000uF 50 volt electrolytic capacitor very near each MOSFET acting as a current dump when the MOSFET turns on.  I'm also using very large traces on the PCB with a grounded backplane (bottom foil).

Would it help to choke the mosfet supply line current?

Dog-One

Itsu,

I just thought of something for you to try...

Add a fairly large inductance, current handling capable choke between the center tap and your positive rail and let us know what that does/changes.  This is what I did to finally figure out my core wasn't optimal.