Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[nelsonrochaa]

Hi Nelson. Maybe I have missed something. The video I saw from you showed a box with one complete
side of the box left open. If that is the test you are referring to, then that does not constitute a Faraday
cage, The box would have to be completely and tightly enclosed on all sides by the metal shielding.
As I have already mentioned, in my own experience an EM generator can easily produce strong EM fields around it
for several feet depending on the exact circuit configuration. You should also be aware that in close proximity
to the EM generator you are within the near fields of the EM generator, so the effectiveness of a Faraday cage
may not be the same for near fields as it is with far fields. Within the near fields you have separate electric and
magnetic fields around the generator. At low frequencies in the kHz range, near fields extend for quite a large distance
as it is wavelength dependent. Outside the near field perimeter is where the electric and magnetic fields combine into EM wave
radiations.

Nelson, I am not sure what you are objecting to exactly. I have only pointed out that Faraday cages will not necessarily
fully reduce EM radiations. How much the EM radiations are reduced depends on various factors.

Hi Void ,
I'm not objecting with nothing void we are exchange some information ,
About the box opened , i already test with box closed but for sure it will be difficulty to i show a video  with box closed .
I appreciate your answers thanks.

[Void]

Hi Void ,
I'm not objecting with nothing void we are exchange some information ,
About the box opened , i already test with box closed but for sure it will be difficulty to i show a video  with box closed .
I appreciate your answers thanks.

No worries Nelson. I was just not sure if I was missing something or not.

If you watch that video about the test with the metal garbage can, I think it provides
some good info on how to evaluate the effectiveness of any particular Faraday cage setup
over a broad range of frequencies.

In your test shown in your video, what were you using as the light bulb?

[nelsonrochaa]

No worries Nelson. I was just not sure if I was missing something or not.

If you watch that video about the test with the metal garbage can, I think it provides
some good info on how to evaluate the effectiveness of any particular Faraday cage setup
over a broad range of frequencies.

In your test shown in your video, what were you using as the light bulb?

Hi void ,
I already see the video and thanks by link, but not clarify me about my doubts but even that  i subscribe the channel because could useful
In my perspective in normal conditions the circuit tx should loose power in air in a normal wireless transfer system , and should drain more current when have load not the opposite, only to clarify my point of view .
I know is difficulty sometimes understand some things without direct observation . 
The bulb used is a 1 watt bulb led .

I appreciate your help .

[nelsonrochaa]

Take a peek of this video.  Near the end Tinsel places a CFL inside the "shielded" can and the light does not come on until he introduces a "source" externally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6uQUxC7DS8

For comparison to Nelson's demonstration, are we seeing the same thing or something quite different?

Hi Doug seems only a bit different because i don't have the wood box "sit down" in top of coil acting like a capacitor like Tinsel do in that video.
So i think is a bit different only not comparable example, i think.
 

[a.king21]

smps  darlington transistor
smps diodes
Joule thief


Let those who have ears to hear - hear.


Thank you Nelson  - you are a STAR!