Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Started by 27Bubba, September 18, 2012, 02:17:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 264 Guests are viewing this topic.

verpies

Quote from: Grumage on February 28, 2017, 09:15:30 AM
I have a feeling the materials needed have different " Electron " characteristics, maybe Verpies could elaborate ? Perhaps "
It is called the Electron Mobility or the Effective Electron Mass.  The idea here is that less massive electrons accelerate easier and move faster in solids.

Thus the Indium Antimonide has the fastest electrons.  See the list below for some other materials:


Material        Effective Electron Mass
-----------------------------------------------
InSb              0.014
HgTe             0.017
Alpha Tin       0.02
InAs              0.022
HgSe             0.03
Cd3As2         0.046
CdSnAs         0.046
GsSb             0.05
Graphene     0.054
InP               0.067
In2Te3          0.07
GaAs            0.068
AlSb             0.09
Sb                0.088
CdO             0.1
CdTe            0.14
CdSb            0.15
ZnSb            0.15
PbS              0.16
CdS              0.16
ZnSe            0.17
Si                 0.19
PbTe            0.21
PbSe            0.3
TlSe             0.3
TlSi               0.3
GaP              0.35
MgSn           0.37
ZnO             0.38
MgSi            0.46
Bi2Te3          0.58

There is also another metric called the "Molar Volume" which indicates how many atoms (or molecules) are in a certain volume of the conductor (e.g. in a cubic centimeter or a cubic meter, liter, gallon, etc..). 
The idea here is that if a conductor has less atoms (and thus less free electrons *) per liter then these electrons will have to "work harder" (read: move faster) to transport e.g. 1 Coulomb of charge per 1 second (= 1 Ampere). 
So conductors with lower molar volume will have faster electrons when conducting the same electric current.


Element             Molar iVolume      Conductivity
Compar. to Cu   [mol/m3 %Cu]     [S/m %Cu]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cesium             10%                      8%
Rubidium          13%                     14%
Potassium        16%                     24%
Radium             16%                      2%
Barium              18%                      5%
Strontium          21%                     13%
Europium          25%                      2%
Ytterbium          27%                      6%
Calcium             28%                     49%
Sodium             30%                     36%
Polonium          31%                      4%
Lanthanum       32%                      3%
Bismuth            33%                      1%
Praseodymium  34%                      2%
Cerium              34%                      2%
Neodymium      35%                      3%
Samarium         35%                      2%
Promethium      36%                      2%
Gadolinium       36%                      1%
Yttrium             36%                      3%
Thorium            36%                     11%
Terbium            37%                      1%
Dysprosium      37%                      2%
Holmium           38%                      2%
Erbium             39%                      2%
Lead                39%                      8%
Antimony          39%                      4%
Thulium            39%                      2%
Lutetium          40%                      3%
Thallium           41%                     11%
Phosphorus     42%                     17%
Tin                    44%                     15%
Indium              45%                     20%
Scandium          47%                      3%
Protactinium     47%                      9%
Mercury             48%                      2%
Zirconium          51%                      4%
Magnesium        51%                     39%
Hafnium             53%                      6%
Arsenic              54%                      6%
Cadmium           55%                     24%
Lithium              55%                     19%
Uranium            57%                      6%
Plutonium         58%                      1%
Gallium             60%                     12%
Neptunium       61%                      1%
Tantalum          66%                     13%
Niobium            66%                     11%
Titanium           67%                      4%
Silver                69%                    105%
Gold                 70%                     76%
Aluminum         71%                     64%
Tungsten         75%                     34%
Molybdenum    76%                     34%
Platinum          77%                     16%
Zinc                 78%                     29%
Rhenium          80%                      9%
Palladium         80%                     17%
Technetium      84%                      8%
Iridium             84%                     36%
Osmium           85%                     20%
Vanadium        85%                      8%
Rhodium          86%                     39%
Ruthenium       87%                     24%
Manganese     97%                      1%
Chromium        98%                     13%
Copper           100%                    100%
Iron                100%                     17%
Cobalt             108%                     29%
Nickel              108%                     24%
Beryllium         146%                     42%

Out of the commonly available conductors, Aluminum beats Copper with Electron Mobility...and Tin beats them both.


* Of course if one atom provides more than one free electron for conduction, then the Electron Mobility is inversely proportional not only to the molar volume but also to the number of free electrons per atom (or molecule).


P.S.
Of course you realize, that once you start considering electron velocity in relation to electromagnetic induction then you are lead straight to the William Barbat patent.



T-1000

Quote from: John.K1 on February 27, 2017, 07:37:12 PM
Tesla coil is based on inductive coupling with the primary. Thus copper is better choice.
If you are assuming Tesla coil working in inductive mode like any step up high frequency transformer for the FE device this will never work.

There are many modes of operation with Tesla coil and one of them is to make it work as oscillating electrostatic machine. As soon that happens the things are going upside down with inductive and capacitive couplings... ;) The "cold" electricity have opposite properties and flows through dialectric sometimes even better than through metal.

Cheers!

Grumage

Quote from: verpies on February 28, 2017, 03:04:34 PM
It is called the Electron Mobility or the Effective Electron Mass.  The idea here is that less massive electrons accelerate easier and move faster in solids.

Thus the Indium Antimonide has the fastest electrons.  See the list below for some other materials:


Out of the commonly available conductors, Aluminum beats Copper with Electron Mobility...and Tin beats them both.


* Of course if one atom provides more than one free electron for conduction, then the Electron Mobility is inversely proportional not only to the molar volume but also to the number of free electrons per atom (or molecule).


P.S.
Of course you realize, that once you start considering electron velocity in relation to electromagnetic induction then you are lead straight to the William Barbat patent.


So, now you know!

Many thanks Verpies.

Kind regards, Graham