Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[GeoFusion]

Hi Jeg, Yes it has ,
hope everything is also fine with you too.

All,
one more thing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wKZ9ehCciU

one of my latest recordings shows what i just described.
starting from 11:50  minutes
I have shown to disconnect the antenna from tesla secondary and manifestation stops at the antenna area.
then connect back to see it manifest again and create the condition.
energy is created when the two charges are met.

Cheerz~

[Void]

Hi Void
I was always wondering what exactly Tesla meant by his following statement. We know that Tesla is probably behind Ruslan's device which also selfruns. is it safe to assume that by  delivering energy at short intervals can help the machine to sustain its own operation?

Tesla Quote
"..The advantage of this apparatus was the delivering of energy at short intervals whereby one could increase activity, and with this scheme I was able to perform all of those wonderful experiments which have been reprinted from time to time in the technical papers.  I would take energy out of a circuit at rates of hundreds or thousands of horsepower.  In Colorado, I reached 18 million horsepower activities, but that was always by this device: Energy stored in the condenser and discharged in an inconceivably small interval of time.  You could not produce that activity with an undamped wave.  The damped wave is of advantage because it gives you, with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilowatts; whereas, if you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you only wave energy at the rate of 1 kilowatt and nothing more.  That is the reason why the system with a quenched gap has become popular.

Hi Jeg. I believe what Tesla is referring to there is instantaneous power. When you use pulses, you can get
short duration pulses of instantaneous power at the output that are a lot higher than the average input power,
but the average output power will of course be lower. Charge a capacitor over a time interval to a
very high voltage and discharge the capacitor in a very short duration pulse and the instantaneous output
power can be very high, but the average output power will typically be a lot lower than that.

All the best...

[Void]

The  Positron (Ion) (+) / Electrons (-).

Hi GeoFusion. A positron is not an ion. Here is a definition of a positron from the net:
"The positron or antielectron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of the electron.
The positron has an electric charge of +1 e, a spin of 1/2 (same as electron), and has the same mass as an electron."

All the best...

[NickZ]

   I think that we are all confused about the source of energy in our surrounding ambient, or in what Tesla calls the "cosmic soup".
   You won't find Tesla confirming the bit about "electrons, and positrons". Which we are still being taught in schools today.
   And that is also one of the reasons why we don't have free energy. The real source of this energy source, is not being recognized, as yet, as we have no way to really measure it, or prove it's existence.  So, for our current limited science, it does not exist.
  Yet, that is not what Tesla thought,  and tested for, to prove the Aether source theory for himself.
  Aether is not electrons and positrons, (as from the gases in the sky), which need matter to exist. As the Aether is the true source of matter. And not the other way around.

  Anyways, what I had asked T-1000, was about the specific details to look for and tune to, to be able to find the interaction between HV and the LV, which can lead to OU. The little secrets that we are NOT being told about.
  Russians have figured this out. But, as I don't understand Russian, in all it's details. I had asked someone who does.
  I was not expecting to find the secret, in electrons and positrons, from gases in the air.  As to me, that is not correct.

       Void: Read Tesla's reply, again:

   "The damped wave is of advantage because it gives you, with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilowatts; whereas, if you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you only wave energy at the rate of 1 kilowatt".

   To me that says, that there is MORE OUT THAN IN. And not LESS, as you mentioned in your last post.
   And he also does explain where the "extra energy" is coming from, in that case. And, energy from matter, is not part of the equation.

[Void]

oid: Read Tesla's reply, again:

   "The damped wave is of advantage because it gives you, with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilowatts; whereas, if you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you only wave energy at the rate of 1 kilowatt".

To me that says, that there is MORE OUT THAN IN. And not LESS, as you mentioned in your last post.
And he also does explain where the "extra energy" is coming from, in that case. And, energy from matter, is not part of the equation.

Hi Nick. I already commented on that. Read my reply to Jeg again. (just kidding)
I expressed my understanding of what Tesla appears to have been referring to there (instantaneous power).
I could be wrong, but that is what Tesla appears to be referring to.

For example, in that same document, there is also this:
--------------
Counsel
What I wanted to get at was, did that depend upon the suddenness of the discharge?
Tesla
Yes.  It is merely the electrical analogue of a pile driver or a hammer.  You accumulate energy through a long distance and then you deliver it with a tremendous suddenness.  The distance through which the mass moves is small—the pressure immense.
--------------

So, Tesla compares it to a pile driver, with the accumulation of energy through a long distance being
analogous to charging up a capacitor over a period time and then releasing it in a sudden impulse where
a very high instantaneous power can be achieved. There is of course a big difference between instantaneous
power and average power. This is what Tesla appears to be describing, as best as I can tell.

Also, as we have discussed in the past, I think if you look into it, you will find that
many things that have been claimed about Tesla can't actually be traced back to Tesla's
actual writings. For example Peter Lindemann claimed a number of things about Tesla
but did not provide references to where Tesla actually said some of those things that Lindemann
was claiming. If someone can point me to actual statements (original documents/transcriptions) from Tesla
himself where Tesla talks about deriving useful energy from the aether or similar I would be very interested to see it.

Also, as I have mentioned here previously, people have very much corrupted Tesla's actual concept of 'radiant energy'
and make all sorts of claims about it that Tesla does not appear to ever actually said. I have read Tesla's patent where Tesla
describes quite clearly what he meant by 'radiant energy', and it is quite different than what many people
claim on the net. I have posted details about this in this thread in the past. Anyway, I know from experience that pointing
out things like that makes little difference. The unsupported claims will continue to be repeated over and over.

This all doesn't matter much anyway I think for the purposes of this thread. What I think is more important 
is what people like  Kapanadze and Akula were really doing in their circuits. As of yet, I have not seen
anyone who can convincingly demonstrate the main principle behind these type of devices with an actual test
setup, so any offered explanations are of course still just speculation at this point.

All the best...