Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[Hoppy]

Maybe V8karlo can quantify what his test results show as a good portion of energy returned to source?

[Void]

The problem with such schemes is any energy returned to the battery will always be
minus the losses of the PWM / Oscillator circuitry and other circuit components
such as any diodes used, and any loads. There are a lot of losses there just to light the bulb.

Now if you just connect a 12V light bulb up to a 12V battery directly, the main losses
are the batttery's internal resistance. You will be close to 100% efficiency if you ignore
the fact that typical batteries do not have a 100% discharge efficiency. 

Some DC to DC converters have an efficiency in the mid to high 90's at low power output,
so a very efficiently designed DC to DC converter is still not even going to be as efficient
as connecting a 12V bulb directly to a 12V battery.

Unless a scheme has a way of drawing energy into the system from external to the system,
such schemes are just not going to be as efficient as powering a bulb directly. If you think in terms
of energy losses in circuits and other components between the battery and bulb, it should be clear
that this type of approach is flawed from the start. So, if you want to get around this, you need to
figure out how to pull in extra energy from outside the system. This is why people start looking at tesla
coils with earth ground connections and spark gaps and that sort of thing. We can fool our self easily enough,
but we can't fool nature. However, nature may hold some secrets yet that we can take advantage of if we can
find and take advantage of those secrets. How can we draw in extra energy from outside the system?
That is the issue to focus on IMO.

[Hoppy]

.

[Belfior]

The problem with such schemes is any energy returned to the battery will always be
minus the losses of the PWM / Oscillator circuitry and other circuit components
such as any diodes used, and any loads. There are a lot of losses there just to light the bulb.

Now if you just connect a 12V light bulb up to a 12V battery directly, the main losses
are the batttery's internal resistance. You will be close to 100% efficiency if you ignore
the fact that typical batteries do not have a 100% discharge efficiency. 

Some DC to DC converters have an efficiency in the mid to high 90's at low power output,
so a very efficiently designed DC to DC converter is still not even going to be as efficient
as connecting a 12V bulb directly to a 12V battery.

Unless a scheme has a way of drawing energy into the system from external to the system,
such schemes are just not going to be as efficient as powering a bulb directly. If you think in terms
of energy losses in circuits and other components between the battery and bulb, it should be clear
that this type of approach is flawed from the start. So, if you want to get around this, you need to
figure out how to pull in extra energy from outside the system. This is why people start looking at tesla
coils with earth ground connections and spark gaps and that sort of thing. We can fool our self easily enough,
but we can't fool nature. However, nature may hold some secrets yet that we can take advantage of if we can
find and take advantage of those secrets. How can we draw in extra energy from outside the system?
That is the issue to focus on IMO.

Can negative voltage be thought of like energy coming at me? That is what it means to me anyway. So can I take the backEMF from a coil and redirect that back into battery?

What if I charge a cap with an NST that lets only negative wave into the cap? So I am pulling from the cap plate. Then on the other side I have load and ground. Will the ground supply the other plate?

[seychelles]

If i could get access with an AI computer and give it this crop circle
i can guaranty that it will come up with a free energy circuit.