Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

[apecore]

Tried it originally with 74HC4046 so did Itsu it was exactly the same made a PCB for it too.
The circuit also has other problems that have not been resolved and errors regarding feedback to the LM393
to the phase, lock is only a phase shift controller that doesn't work as is! to correct it would require another 4046
It's to do with the chip works it pulls the wave one way or the other, it needs a latch to stabilise the wave on a rising edge.
Where you shows it in the middle, nice one till it does real work.

You are correct about the working of the PLL.
There are many ways to accomplish how to control the phase automatically.

Maybe i will make a short vid in the near future how my kacher interupter is working with PLL in a DRSSTC setup.


Greetings

[AlienGrey]

Here is a device Nelson Rocher designed  I'm fiddling with, I did originally I had a coil twice the size
but I'm not sure it makes much difference  it draws 15volt logic power internally, with a 12-volt input of 220ma with no load.

Before someone screams it's off topic but is it really ?

[NickZ]

You are correct about the working of the PLL.
There are many ways to accomplish how to control the phase automatically.

Maybe i will make a short vid in the near future how my kacher interupter is working with PLL in a DRSSTC setup.


Greetings

   apecore:
   Perhaps on your near future video you can also show the difference that the interuptor kacher circuit can make, at the output bulbs. Especially while using a 300 to 500w load of bulbs, at the same time the inductor is on, then just turn the Kacher off, but leaving the induction circuit still on.  As that will show the effectiveness of the sync and it's interaction, between the controlable Kacher, and the induction circuit's operation.
   Many times the Kacher's interaction will show an improvement at the output when using a smaller load (100w), but not a higher loads, (above 500w). Which is what has been my results, and which normally proves (at least to me) that the sync is not right on the money. That is what I'm working on to correct, if possible.

[T-1000]

Just a bit of refreshing memory - in https://img0.liveinternet.ru/images/attach/c/6/91/684/91684490_large_100_6334.JPG and https://img1.liveinternet.ru/images/attach/c/6/91/684/91684491_large_100_6335.JPG Dally did not have katcher nor fancy PLLs. Only narrow pulse was going into coax cable between 2 windings and still making same power amplification result.
So what everyone is missing?

[NickZ]

  T-1000:   In my humble opinion... If the Kacher secondary coil does not free run at the exact proper frequency to begin with, the controllable kacher circuit will NOT make up for it, by readjusting the off frequency to the correct match. No matter how you turn the trim pots. The results are little to no gain, or just a small gain, but still no OU, nor the ability to self run. And showing NO GAIN above 500 plus watts loads. I think that may be where we are all stuck at. Trying to compensate for an improper match, to begin with.  We need to know the exact wire sizes of all the coils, and adjust the Kacher secondary to resonate at the right frequency. 
   It has also been shown by several guys, Ruslan, Stalker, Adrian, etz...how the simple Kacher circuit is used on self runners, as well. So, the secret is not in the PLL, which may be locking onto an off match.