Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[forest]

When ever in the past I have asked how an alternator can use potential from a battery to form a field to power the loads and charge the battery which really does seem impossible.I am always told the engine provides motive power to turn the field to induce upon or in the stator the current and voltage to power the loads and charge the battery. Induction on the stator formed by building up and reversing magnetic field direction repeatedly quickly. The speed and strength of the feild regulated to offset each other should one be less then enough to get results. I always wondered why the snake cant eat it's tail other then the pain. I never really went as far as to examine the field strength required to get the effects in a counter form without motive power added to create the strength of field. Or how one would double the field strength in the stator with out needing twice the current which would consume more then the required output to do all that work. So looking for the differences between my imaginationary model and the topic of the thread I see a clever use of colliding two of the same direction poles. Thinking about examples of this effect,collision of two objects.How would that help when the two objects consume (x?) amount of energy to get moving so they can collide.At best resulting in no gain and more likely loss will never be avioded. Well eventually I considered a train motor car pushing two box cars side by side down two tracks side by side.One motor car two box cars. To a portion of tracks that ends in a closed loop. How much energy is there in the collision of two objects that are propelled by a single force and then seperated in direction so they can be smashed agaisnt one another? If the total amount of energy could be taken from the point of impact between the two cars would that equal the amount the of energy used to get the two cars moving? Like wise if two seamingly week electro magnets are put up agaist one another n to n or s to s  is the resulting crash 1+1 or something other then?What trickery can be applied to suck out every stitch of power from the point of impact instead of trying to leach off the effects of the moving cars as they pass by from the sides?Tansformers seem to be working off the sides of the fields only. While this thing is using the sides to set up fields (Motion) on the pole faces and smashing them together and pulling off at the point of impact. Is the strength of the feild magnified in the space between pole faces and what likely winding shape would it take to pick off the effect and transform it to current? The shape of field as it grows and compresses against the same would be usefull to determine the type of winding and if it should encompass the individual n or s feilds or all of them together?Or both? Just wondering.

Woooo ,sorry...I have inability to learn long english sentences....but I will try to help you.....ready ? steady ? GO!
watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swNkzM-GYQ0

[hanon]

Hi all,

I have been helping to the person who did the first report about the life and inventions of Clemente Figuera in order to include more documentation into his site as well as translating it into English to make easier its understanding by most readers. We have included new material, some of them not yet released until now. The attached files to the new site are:
-        The pdf files of the 5 Figuera patents 
-        Test of practical implementation of a patent filed in 1910 by Buforn, a financial partner of Figuera, who kept on trying to commercialize his generator after Figuera´s death
-        A press report about Figuera
-        An interview to Figuera
-        Figuera´s telegram about the sale of the 1902 patent to a banker union
-        List of Buforn´s patents after Figuera´s death (you can see that they are mostly a copy of the Figuera design from 1908)
-        Some press clippings about Figuera´s invention

Spanish webpage: http://www.alpoma.net/tecob/?p=4005             (link)
English webpage:  http://www.alpoma.net/tecob/?page_id=8258    (link)

[hanon]

"The inventor holds that his generator will
solve a portion of problems, including those
which are derived from navigation, because
a great power can be carried in a very
small space, stating that the secret of his
invention resembles the egg of Columbus."

Egg of Columbus:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egg_of_Columbus

[forest]

"The inventor holds that his generator will
solve a portion of problems, including those
which are derived from navigation, because
a great power can be carried in a very
small space, stating that the secret of his
invention resembles the egg of Columbus."

Egg of Columbus:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egg_of_Columbus

Yes, the simplicity overlooked by others. The scientific fact nobody care about ! The simple reality we ALL KNOW...Guess what ..

[hanon]

Tesla presented his Egg of Columbus the previous decade at the Chicago World's Fair in 1893.  Coincidence?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla%27s_Egg_of_Columbus

"Tesla's device used a toroidal iron core stator on which four coils were wound. The device was powered by a two-phase alternating current source (such as a variable speed alternator) to create the rotating magnetic field."

See the drawing into Figuera´s patent 30378:  http://www.alpoma.com/figuera/docums/30378.pdf

I copy one suggestion which was given to me:  "Therefore, what he does is a "Static Simulation" of the same exact changes the conductor faces, by applying a pulsating or sine wave current to the exciting coils...  ....creating a "Virtual Rotary Pulse"...we could easily apply it here if we independently feed one channel per independent exciter coils"