Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

AL ORIGEN  = TO THE SOURCE

[NRamaswami]

Thanks Hanon:

It would then mean that the two points are both connected to battery minus (if the input is DC or minus point of source if any other type of current like AC or pulsed DC. AC is ruled out then as current changes direction 50 times a second in AC and so the input is either Pulsed DC or DC) and one of the wires coming from source minus is connected to an earth point before it goes to the electromagnets that it will power. I will have it replicated exactly as shown in the patent and see what results are obtained. I will be doing this around May 20th or 21st only and then I will post the videos and pictures. Since the device will be an exact replication effort, we will know if the effort succeeds or fails. It has taken a lot of efforts for me to understand what is the problem with the rotary device and how to avoid sparks and we needed to handbuilt it and see that it must always touch two points. Only when we design it to touch three points it will always touch two points all the time. I'm only now confident that the rotary device can be built cheaply and easily and can remain very sturdy also so that it will last for a very long time. If there is no spark, no heat. Then the device will last a very long time. We may then need only one of the half of the rotating arm to have the brushes.

If we use pulsed DC using a bridge rectifier from the mains AC then it becomes automaticaly an interrupted DC current. For the direction of AC changes 50 times a second and for these 50 times a second we are not going have any electricity flowing from the source. But were bridge rectifiers available in 1908?. I doubt it very much.

Regarding the input current the patent says that is either an interrupted current or Alternating current. But the whole thing appears to show only a DC current source or a battery or series of batteries connected to provide a particular voltage and amperage for the input to the primary. Let me check it again. So significant work appears to remain here even after this type of focused effort.

I will check both the idetical poles facing each other and the opposite poles facing other. We will try to see how this can be worked around.

[Doug1]

The first rectifying device without commutation was patented in 1889.Which used a perminent magnet or a battery or a special group of motor sets on a single shaft I mentioned that a long time ago. No way to tell how many people were using it or came to the same conclusion before someone bothered to patent it.

[NRamaswami]

I'm not able to avoid sparks even when the brush touches 2 contact points always. The only thing that I'm able to achieve is that the sparking is very minute now. It is not clear to me how when one charged rotating arm touches another charged static component a spark can be avoided. It may be considered as a rotating spark gap. I will need further experimentation on this before I can close it. Will update you all if there is any progress.

[RandyFL]

18 May 13 / 21:32:05
Hello All
A few months back ( before the Xmas Holidays ) I built the Figuera's circuit that was on Patrick's website...I got the 555 to fire 16 LEDs then switched down to 4 diodes and power transistor and got the circuit to fire into a radio shack transformer ( I switched the transformer connections ) instead of using the transformer as a step down I reversed the connections and used it as a step up transformer... I was powering the 555 with a Best9 volt battery and got 1 Volt AC from the transformer... I was satisfied with the circuit and was going to finish up a previous planned house project before coming back to the circuit...upon completion of the house project I noticed an update on the Patrick website stating...                                                                                                                                                                                                "It is essential to construct each of the cores of the electromagnets from iron and only iron. While a laminated core does minimise eddy currents, in this application, a laminated core has a major negative magnetic effect (something which is not generally known)."

Could someone elaborate on this...
All the Best
RandyFL