Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

antijon

@hanon, that's the circuit I tried... I'll try it again with more input power and see what I get. Thanks, I'll try also on a single inductor shaft.

I think you're right about the linear coils, but the statement that makes me wonder is, "The machine is essentially characterized by two series of electromagnets which form the inductor circuit, between whose poles the reels of the induced are properly placed." Taken from http://www.rexresearch.com/figuera/figuera.htm#patents Spanish Patent # 4426, Notes section. The "induced circuit" is the only location he refers to as a "reel" coil... strange, because he refers to the primaries as electromagnets. What exactly is a reel coil? He also says, "properly placed," which makes me think there's more to this than just the way the primaries are powered.

Any thoughts?

stupify12

Quote from: antijon on August 03, 2014, 02:16:26 PM
Hey everyone.
@hanon, thanks for the info. I have since been using capacitors in series with coils to produce a phase difference.

This is what I've been working with. Two E core transformers, sandwiched together, giving me a dual-primary transformer. I don't think this is the proper arrangement for the Figuera generator.


@stupify12, if you could please explain more as to what you think is the proper coil configuration, I might try to produce it, but as you can see, if the two primaries and secondary share the same flux path, like a transformer, I think the results will be the same as what I have achieved.

Hello antijon,

I think all in this forum is very confuse on what is the actually operation of this Figuera Generator- it is because we think much more complicated theories and design of what we could think of. Actually the Figuera Generator is so simple that it follows the Faraday Law of Induction and re design the principles behind the rotation of the DC Dynamo Motor, and eliminating the rotation of either the Generating Rotor and Permanent Excitator Electromagnets of Stator in a DC Generator by using the Increase and Decrease Intensity of Magnetization on the Cores.

Think of this. The DC Generator has separated Rotor/Armature and Stator Permanent Magnet. So we will now put that in our Figuera Generator Design- The Excitator Electromagnets Stator should have a separated Laminted/Soft Iron Core from Induced Generating Coils. The DC Generator has 2 Permanent Magnet in a Magnetic Attraction position.
What we need to re produce Figuera Generator.

1.Because it is motionless. We need a 2 separated Electromagnets(This electromagnet is wound in a U shape form to project it's North in one end, and South in the other end. We need two of this U shape Electromagnet to make a attractive magnetic force between the 2 U shape electromagnets configure like this.

The 1st U North end will face the 2nd U South end.
The 1st U South end will face the 2nd U North end.
U shape core / I think all of you already know the PMH= Perpetual Magnet Holder something like that.

The 2nd U North end will face the 1st U South end.
The 2nd U South end will face the 1st U North end.

How could Figuera imitate the rotation of Induced Coils with out movement? Well it is simple. The only special Figuera did is the Rotationg Variable Resistor. The two U shape core is being fed with a Positive Terminal  from the Commutator.
The feeding is like swiping the Variable Resistor from Left to Right/ Right to Left. The input of the Positive terminal is in the Mid Point of this Variable Resistor.

Let's say, that the 1st U shape core is on the maximum magnetization then the Induced Coils are now being cut with the flux of the 1st U electromagnet. The 1st U shape induced Maximum North- South flux on the Induced Coils, because of the variable excitation with the help of the Elementary Drawn Resistor, when the wiper is connected to the center of the Wire Wound Resistor there is now two equal flux the 1st U shape North-South and the 2 U shape South-North until the wiper pass the midpoint, Magnetizing the 2nd U shape South-North maximum flux while the North-South of the 1st U shape is on the minimum magnetic flux.

The resulting waveform on the Induced coils is now more like a Alternating Current. That is the reason Tesla had mention on one of his letters that he has long ago found the principles behind on Figuera Generator, which Tesla mean was the Alternating Current.

I hope that my explaination will not add more confusion on you guys. Happy to share this ideas and thoughts with others.

Meow.


Figuera Quote!
QuoteBecause we all know that the effects that are manifested when a closed
circuit approaches and moves away from a magnetic center are the same as
when, this circuit being still and motionless, the magnetic field is increased
and reduced in intensity; since any variation , occurring in the flow traversing
a circuit is producing electrical induced current.

Figuera
QuoteIt was considered the
possibility of building a machine that would work, not in the principle of
movement, as do the current dynamos, but using the principle of increase
and decrease, this is the variation of the power of the magnetic field, or the
electrical current which produces it.


Figuera
Quotemagnetize one or more
electromagnets and, while the current is higher or lower the magnetization of
the electromagnets is decreasing or increasing and varying, therefore, the
intensity of the magnetic field , this is, the flow which crosses the induced
circuit.





stupify12

Quote from: antijon on August 03, 2014, 07:45:02 PM
@hanon, that's the circuit I tried... I'll try it again with more input power and see what I get. Thanks, I'll try also on a single inductor shaft.

I think you're right about the linear coils, but the statement that makes me wonder is, "The machine is essentially characterized by two series of electromagnets which form the inductor circuit, between whose poles the reels of the induced are properly placed." Taken from http://www.rexresearch.com/figuera/figuera.htm#patents Spanish Patent # 4426, Notes section. The "induced circuit" is the only location he refers to as a "reel" coil... strange, because he refers to the primaries as electromagnets. What exactly is a reel coil? He also says, "properly placed," which makes me think there's more to this than just the way the primaries are powered.

Any thoughts?

The two series of electromagnets which form the inductor circuit- is the picture on the above post. The reels is the Induced Coils/Generating Coils place between this two U shape Electromagnets.

I think you should focus on the Variable Excitation/Variable Resistance with Two Output on each end, the input Positive terminal is connected on the Midpin .


Meow

Doug1

A good site for inspiration http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/OnFailingG.html

  Edison made 1000 not working light bulbs before the one that did. Without those failures it may have never happened and we would still be using carbon lights gas lights or candles.

Go back to the beginning starting with the magnet. There are two inducer magnets and one induced coil. The inducers reprsent 2/3 rds of the device. Master the majority, the magnet.

hanon

Hi all,

Good news!! I think I have solved the principle under one of the Figuera´s patent. I am referring to patent No. 30376 (year 1902), the one with the rotary induced circuit and stationary internal and external electromagnets (Link to pdf). This is not the patent from year 1908 with the variable fields. In this patent a SINGLE MOVING WIRE crosses between TWO OPPOSITE MAGNET POLES. According to Figuera´s patent text this configuration produces electricity without dragging the movement of the induced wire.

The key for avoiding dragging is the use of two opposite poles to generate the induction in the intermediate wire:  N -- | -- S  ; in contrast with common generators with just one pole exposed to the induced wire.

       1- A wire is moved between two opposite poles: North and South

       2- As a consequence an induce current will appear in the wire

       3- This induced current generates a magnetic field (B) around the wire

       4- One pole (let´s say  N pole) will repel the wire because of magnetic repulsion with the magnetic field in the wire (creating a drag). But the other pole ( S pole in our example) will attract the wire (magnetic attraction between the S pole and the wire)

       5- Therefore the net sum of both forces (repulsion + attraction) will be null and the wire finally will be moved without any drag while at the same time will generate an induced current.

I think it is as simple as explained here. Figuera also stated that he could not believe how such a simple principle had not been used before him.

All Figuera´s patents are based on the induction created between two electromagnets, instead of common induction with just one pole exposed. IMHO, This is the key of his discovery.

I attach a schematic of the generator (patent 30376) done by Ufopolitics (in EF forum). Also I attach an sketch with the representation of this principle. Please study this sketch and tell your comments.