Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bajac]

Hanon,
Could you post a diagram of the device you are trying to construct? From the picture, I cannot relate the apparatus to the Figuera's devices of 1902 or 1908.
On the other hand, before I start working on my second Figuera's 1908 device, I will run some more test for the device I built a few months ago. Until know, I have being testing the device with a minimum air gap but looking at Figuera's patent drawing it is noted that the air gaps are shown relatively big. For this option, I will need to induce a larger magnetic field in the primary coils by increasing the current. It does not make sense to me, but what the heck, I will follow the whatever hints I can observe from the 1908 patent.
I have also discovered from a practical point of view how a magnetic field flowing in the same direction is able to self-induce voltages of different polarities within the same coil. When I have the time, I will start putting together a draft version of the narratives and sketches explaining this interesting event, which I have never seen in any engineering books or literature. I think we need to decipher first how the magnetic circuits really work in the real world. Not just from formulas and mathematical concepts which do not always show the real picture.
Thank you,
Bajac

[marathonman]

Doug, you are correct the primary cores are one way and the secondary are bi way so your assessment is correct. just make sure your secondaries are non Grain orientated laminates. I want to thank you for you contribution to this thread.
Hanon, is does not mater what size of cap it will unphase both as i understand it. it does not change intensity or voltage just offsets by 90%. just make sure the cap can handle the voltage and the capacity can handle the amp draw by double. it is good to see your work, progress is awesome and your contribution is highly regarded and appreciated.

Bajac, i have constructed circuits for both types of Drive for the Flynn type set up. one is by 555 timing and the other is by slotted disc. if any one wants the circuit just drop me a dime and i will send it to whom ever wants it with bom. both are shown without copper pour for clarity and are over constructed for Longevity. the circuit is for two drive pairs but one can only use what he or she wants except for the 555 circuit it has 4 but i can change for two if needed. the Patent shows only two drive mags but i figured it can be constructed for half of Stator mags. ie. if you have 8 Stator mags then the Rotor Mags can be 4. i have designed one for 16 Stator mags and 8 Rotor Mags that will turn big Generator head.
thank you for your contribution....your insites are highly regarded and appreciated.

tomorrow i will be homeless so i will get to it when i can. had big yard sale so i hope i will sell boat to by another car and get my good job back.
"Happy Figuering"
Sorry pics are to big and not to clear i forgot to check size. (OPS!)
National Security Act of 1947 is a betrayal of American sovereignty and liberty and the main means for oppression of the American people.

[hanon]

Bajac,

My device is as Figuera described it in 1908: One electromagnet down, One electromagnet up,  and One collecting coil  between their poles. For clarity I will attach an sketch that you will find familiar. I do not understand why you don not accept this scheme as the 1908 patent and you just accept the closed circuit  transformer type. We are dealing with different induction laws, not related to common physics!!  Hubbard coils, hendershot, VTA, Don Smith,...all of them uses open magnetic circuits.

Also for people who have not read the 1908 patent I want to clarify that Figuera did not tell anything in the text about air gaps. All the discussion about air gaps is derived from the drawing, where Figuera drew the coils with some separation.

Also I will copy the translation of a paragraph from the Buforn patent 57955 (year 1914) which states that those devices can be stacked up in order to use two poles from each electromagnet . THEREFORE, the basic configuration just use one pole !!!

PARAGRAPH FROM BUFORN 57955 PATENT (PAGE 14)

If you want even greater production you can place the inducers and the induced one
after the other forming a single series in the next way: you place first an electromagnet
N, for example, next another electromagnet S, and between their poles and properly
placed you put the corresponding induced, with this we will have formed a group of
battery as explained before, but now (instead of forming as many identical groups to the
first one as number of induced coils needed) you can place, following the last
electromagnet S, another induced and, after this last induced you can place an inducer
N, following this inducer by another induced, and then by another S, and so on until
having placed all the inducers which form the series of electromagnet N and S.
With this we will have succeeded in using the two poles of all inducers except the first
and the last one of which we will have only used one pole and, therefore we will have as
many inducers as induced minus one, this is, if "m" is for example the number of
inducers, then the number of induced will be "m – 1", which determine a considerable
increase in the production of the induced current with the same expenditure of force.

[bajac]

Hanon,
No need to get defensive. I did not mean to upset you. It was just a simple and honest question.
So you are saying that your device follows the teachings of the 1914 Buforn's patent, right?
What I see from the picture is three (or five) coils wound in the same core. The core ends at two C-type cores oriented inward with two very large air gaps. Is the core something like this?

**********************************
*                                                                      *
*            **********          **********          *
*          *                *           *                 *          *
*         *                 *           *                  *       *
*****                   *           *                   *****
                             *           *                   
                             *           *                   
                             *           *                   
                             *           *                   
*****                   *           *                  *****
*        *                  *           *                  *       *
*        *                  *           *                  *       *
*          **********           **********         *
*                                                                    *
********************************** 

[ALVARO_CS]

with your permission hanon,
correct me if wrong