Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[bajac]

Bajac, for some reason I couldn't download your document. Could you repost it, please? And yes, it does seem that they were trying to make a fool of Mordey.

Antijon,
Could you provide me with the reply number where the document is found? I am not sure which document you are referring.

Thanks,
Bajac

[john-g]

Hi

This may be helpful about the testing method used by Mordey:

[antijon]

Thanks Bajac, but never mind. I was able to download it with a different browser. That's the basis you're going to use in your device?

[bajac]

John,

Thank you very much for the information!

It is interesting how the engineers of the time made a big effort for determining the heating losses of the alternators in order to calculate their efficiency. I have not seen a generator test performed to determine the efficiency as a function of the power output divided by the mechanical power input. All these efficiency calculations are based on the power output and the heating losses of the alternator only. My questions is, would you care to have an alternator with 30% heating losses and a COP of 400%? Such alternators would be self-excited and fuel free; and with a very simple construction, indeed.

Antijon,

If you are referring to the overunity transformer, yes! Later on I will post a diagram showing what I am planning to build for discussion. I already have rolls of silicon steel sheets. I will use a special scissors for making the lamination of the cores. For this type of AC device is recommended to use laminated cores to reduced the losses due to Eddy currents.

Thanks,
Bajac

[bajac]

I wanted to show you one generator posted in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHSXSsNroho
Can you see any similarity with the topic we have been discussing in this thread?

The device shown in this video is a degraded version of the iron-less coil armature principle used by Figuera, Ferranti, Mordey, Thompson, Hopkinson, and Tesla. Note that the above pioneers always had the induced iron-less coils in an air gap between a south and north magnetic poles, which is the setup that maximizes the magnetic flux in the air gap. The generator in this video is using one side of the magnet to face a side of the coil, only. Therefore, most of the magnetic lines of force stay closed to their magnets. Whenever you kill the dipole, the number of flux lines and magnetic intensity is decreased. Why do we want to do that? It is done that way because the principle of iron-less induced coil generators is not well understood.

Because a higher number of magnetic force lines are concentrated whenever there are two opposing magnetic poles, a much higher voltage can be induced when the coils travel through the air gap. It requires a stronger force to separate two opposing magnetic poles than the force required to push together two equal magnetic poles. In other words, the flux linkage is higher between opposing magnetic poles.